- First Name
- Levi
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2023
- Threads
- 39
- Messages
- 1,742
- Reaction score
- 2,035
- Location
- Spring Lake Michigan
- Vehicle(s)
- 23 F150-2016 RS/ 22 GT500/ rx8 x2/ 95 mustang GT/ 17 edge.
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
- Thread starter
- #31
I know what each does as I have been part of rd for catch cans. I was simply saying that the whole goal is to remove oil whether mist or vapor form out intake. If it doesn’t have enough pressure to push it up into the intake then it’s also keeping it out. Two sides of the same coin. I’m not even saying the catch can isn’t better. But, this is another safety measure. If you were getting less pressure through your pcv you should get less in your catch can. Hence why I boost cars that make very little crank pressure never seem to need to empty a catch can.Alright, may be I wasn't as clear and concise as I should have been. The breather, on a stock 2.0, would be nothing more than a redundant PCV valve (the breather using a weighted ball and the PCV valve using a compression spring). An oil catch can is not a comparison to to a PCV system. The PCV system utilizes an oil separator plate (with baffles) to slow down the air and allow the vapor to condense and then drop back down into the crankcase where the oil catch can will actually collect any particles that have a chance to condense. I believe the breather, in a case where you are not adding any more boost than what the PCV valve is already designed for, would serve no purpose. An oil catch can, if you are worried about carbon build up on the back of the intake valves would be the ideal part to purchase.
Sponsored