- First Name
- Larry
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2024
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 1,180
- Reaction score
- 1,517
- Location
- Santa Clarita, CA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2024 Maverick Lariat FX4 4K tow
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
Moving to EV’s is not some extreme move or self righteous statement made by technophiles. It is the natural progression of our ever expanding society.> some point soon all vehicles will be BEV. Period.
god i hope not but i'm scared you're right. the world does love flying to the extremes--and e-vehicles are extremely all the rage now.
plays to the ego of self-righteous technophiles with deep pockets and empty heads who love to show that they're doing something about global whining (sorry: warming)
never mind ev's total dependence on a stable electric grid--pretty much an oxymoron. almost the first thing to fail in a catastrophic disaster is the electric grid. within a few days my bumper-sticker cliche e-car is dead.
and never mind we're robbing peter to pay paul: forsaking the toxic and polluting oil industry for an even more toxic and polluting mining industry? least regulated and most toxic industry on earth is mining.
we all have friends with new e-cars and it's just a matter of time till we hear them complain suddenly of being sensitive to exhaust fumes--as if they'd never smelled them in their life
my argument is i wonder if farmers in bolivia and argentina are suddenly sensitive to the lithium slag in their ground water
nyt article claims hybrids are the most economical vehicles to drive; ev's charged at home cost more per mile than gas cars and ev's charged at public charging stations are the most expensive cost per mile of any vehicle
even when the lights go out--and that's inevitable--my mav will still be running. and i've got a siphon pump with a long hose to salvage gas whenever i need it
argument of the electric vehicle proponent is that such scenarios as i envision are the product of a fault-finder who's watched too many apocalypse films: it is the philosophy of the survivalist
but isn't that what i am? i intend surviving so that makes me a survivalist, right?
thanx for the width
London started realizing in the mid 1800’s that their “pea-soup” fog was killing hundreds of people from bronchitis every time their city became besieged by the fog, which was multiple times per year. Then they figured out that it was high sulfur content coal that was causing it. Then they made changes to stop it. Rinse and repeat, generation after generation.
That was when the earth had 1.2 billion people. Now we have 8.2 billion. And even though we’ve moved to cleaner petroleum products like gasoline with catalytic converters, we are still poisoning the earth faster than it can heal, because of how many people there are now.
Fortunately most people nowadays understand this and are onboard with making
changes to completely eliminate fossil fuel use.
When when I say “most people”, what I mean is that Gen Alpha and Gen Z are totally onboard with an all electric future. And the vast majority of millennials are onboard with all electric. And nearly half of Gen X is onboard with an all electric future. It’s only the boomers that fear EV’s and are going to be buried with their gas can still gripped in their cold, dead hands. Most of the silent generation are already gone. Every driver in the greatest generation are gone.
In a few generations, when the boomers are all gone, gas powered cars are going to be a quaint notion, similar to how we think of steam locomotives and horse drawn buggies today.
You think you’re going to survive the apocalypse by having a gas powered car, but in reality, there’s not going to be an apocalypse. My mom is a prepper. She’s been telling me these apocalypse stories for over 50 years. It’s never happened. She’s in her 80’s now and is going to die from old age without ever living to see her feared apocalypse. The same thing is going to happen to you and me as well.
Sponsored