Because all the knuckleheads are assuming it'll be a Toyota from the 80s. Somehow ignoring all the problems Toyota has been having. They have a Mav, so all they see are 'all' the recalls and issues, but aren't looking into all the recalls Toyota has had in the recent past.I'm wondering why everyone is talking about trading there Maverick for something else? At first we couldn't wait for our affordable under $25K truck to own. We all have a truck that's only a few years old, and doesn't need replacing for at least 5 years. It will cost you more then you think to switch for a new vehicle, between trade in value, and the prices new to the market trucks, with the problems new vehicles need to face. Now that the Mavericks have been around for a few years, less recalls are being sent out. Chill out, and enjoy one of your best deals in the last few years.
78-94 (1987 in the US), they had the jump seats in the bed and T-tops available, a real 80's era dream machine! It was popular to lift them and put in the newer engines in place of the EA81/EA82 like the EJ18/EJ20/EJ22T. The extreme lift ones usually did away with the independent suspension and put in an extra transfer case for dual low range, and Toyota straight axles.When was the last year for the Brat? I remember a guy I worked with in the early 80s had 1 with the seats in the bed.
What if you want it to drive like a Lada though? At least off road, one of these might get further up a nasty trail than a Tremor.Competition is always good and fuels innovation, without it we'd basically be driving around a bunch of 2025s that look and drive like Soviet Russia cold war Lada crap heaps!
Chicken tax eventually stifled the competition I think. The jump seat configuration was how Subaru got around it, but rising safety standards on the way would eliminate that workaround, so probably not worth it to ship the model refresh to the US.So why wouldn't Subaru continue selling them after 1987 when Rangers and S-10s were selling like crazy? Was it cost or quality issues? Of course Mazda dropped their small truck around the same time and sold rebadged Rangers.
Both of these trucks are 2 seaters, with short wheel bases. More Jeep, then small truck.![]()
Lifted and bobbed tail, on 35's
![]()
Next to one with a small 3" lift w/ a cap
Toyotas and Subies been at it for years with the small nimble trucks, Some day a Maverick will get there...![]()
Well, both of those Subies are 4 seaters as originally equipped, but yeah, the wheel base was 97" vs our 121"Both of these trucks are 2 seaters, with short wheel bases. More Jeep, then small truck.
I didn't know they were 4 seaters, still , I don't care for short wheel bases. Thanks for setting me straight on the Subies, they are like Jeeps!Well, both of those Subies are 4 seaters as originally equipped, but yeah, the wheel base was 97" vs our 121"
Now I remember, YES, they had 2 seats in the bed. I lived in New York on Long Island, and it was against the law to have anyone ride in the bed of a truck, not sure about upstate New York.Well, both of those Subies are 4 seaters as originally equipped, but yeah, the wheel base was 97" vs our 121"
Junk but I'll bet they're easy to work on and modify. I had a few Fiats in my early days. They needed some work to keep going but we're fun to drive when all the American cars were big boats.What if you want it to drive like a Lada though? At least off road, one of these might get further up a nasty trail than a Tremor.
![]()
Brats weren't in the same class as Rangers and S10s, they were tiny! They had some length because of the bed, but they were based on a super compact car.So why wouldn't Subaru continue selling them after 1987 when Rangers and S-10s were selling like crazy? Was it cost or quality issues? Of course Mazda dropped their small truck around the same time and sold rebadged Rangers.