Maverick size

99Mustang

Active member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
28
Reaction score
65
Location
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Vehicle(s)
99 Mustang 07 F150 17 Fiesta
Would the size be comparable to a slightly smaller Sport Trac? I had one in high school and it did all I ever needed it to.
The Maverick will be smaller than the current Ranger, So it will be much smaller than the Sport Trac which was Explorer based. Welcome aboard Trey.
 

MarcusBrody

Active member
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Messages
36
Reaction score
77
Location
Nevada
Vehicle(s)
Ford Transit Connect, BMW 318ti
Bronco Sport over Maverick Testing Mule
bandm.JPG


Maverick Testing Mule in front of Ranger
randm.JPG
From these images, I'd guess the Maverick will be about ~197 to 200 in, with my guess being closer to the latter. The Bronco is 172.7 in. The Ranger is 210.8. Doing some pixel measuring, it seems like the Maverick is about .935 of the ranger and 1.158 of the Bronco Sport. Obviously the images aren't perfectly aligned (esp. the Ranger image) and it's unclear whether the Maverick has it's final bumper, etc., but I think that it's a close guess and it would make sense.

The Bronco Sport has a cargo space length of 33 in behind the rear seats and a width of 41.5 in between the wheel wells, so if this is 26 inches longer, I'd expect maybe a 4.5 ft bed.
 

the1mrb

Active member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Nov 16, 2020
Messages
30
Reaction score
65
Location
Duluth, MN
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XLT FX4
From these images, I'd guess the Maverick will be about ~197 to 200 in, with my guess being closer to the latter. The Bronco is 172.7 in. The Ranger is 210.8. Doing some pixel measuring, it seems like the Maverick is about .935 of the ranger and 1.158 of the Bronco Sport. Obviously the images aren't perfectly aligned (esp. the Ranger image) and it's unclear whether the Maverick has it's final bumper, etc., but I think that it's a close guess and it would make sense.

The Bronco Sport has a cargo space length of 33 in behind the rear seats and a width of 41.5 in between the wheel wells, so if this is 26 inches longer, I'd expect maybe a 4.5 ft bed.
4.5ft bed seems like a good call, just from a symmetry point with other short beds on the market.

Compact truck (Maverick): 4.5ft bed
Midsize truck (Ranger): 5ft bed
Fullsize truck (F-150): 5.5ft bed

Increasing in 6" increments as you go up in size. That would certainly please my OCD and need for patterns. haha
 

rtcraft89

Member
First Name
Trey
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
13
Reaction score
25
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
Mercedes E-500
From these images, I'd guess the Maverick will be about ~197 to 200 in, with my guess being closer to the latter. The Bronco is 172.7 in. The Ranger is 210.8. Doing some pixel measuring, it seems like the Maverick is about .935 of the ranger and 1.158 of the Bronco Sport. Obviously the images aren't perfectly aligned (esp. the Ranger image) and it's unclear whether the Maverick has it's final bumper, etc., but I think that it's a close guess and it would make sense.

The Bronco Sport has a cargo space length of 33 in behind the rear seats and a width of 41.5 in between the wheel wells, so if this is 26 inches longer, I'd expect maybe a 4.5 ft bed.
This would be ideal for me. For the second row, would you expect the leg and head space to be similar to the Bronco Sport?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

MarcusBrody

Active member
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Messages
36
Reaction score
77
Location
Nevada
Vehicle(s)
Ford Transit Connect, BMW 318ti
This would be ideal for me. For the second row, would you expect the leg and head space to be similar to the Bronco Sport?
That was my assumption, but I was just going by leaked exterior photos so who knows if it's an accurate assumption.
 
Top