Sponsored

Maverick size

MarcusBrody

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
186
Reaction score
368
Location
Nevada
Vehicle(s)
Ford Transit Connect, BMW 318ti
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Bronco Sport over Maverick Testing Mule
bandm.JPG


Maverick Testing Mule in front of Ranger
randm.JPG
From these images, I'd guess the Maverick will be about ~197 to 200 in, with my guess being closer to the latter. The Bronco is 172.7 in. The Ranger is 210.8. Doing some pixel measuring, it seems like the Maverick is about .935 of the ranger and 1.158 of the Bronco Sport. Obviously the images aren't perfectly aligned (esp. the Ranger image) and it's unclear whether the Maverick has it's final bumper, etc., but I think that it's a close guess and it would make sense.

The Bronco Sport has a cargo space length of 33 in behind the rear seats and a width of 41.5 in between the wheel wells, so if this is 26 inches longer, I'd expect maybe a 4.5 ft bed.
 

rtcraft89

Well-known member
First Name
Trey
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
81
Reaction score
196
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
Mercedes E-500
From these images, I'd guess the Maverick will be about ~197 to 200 in, with my guess being closer to the latter. The Bronco is 172.7 in. The Ranger is 210.8. Doing some pixel measuring, it seems like the Maverick is about .935 of the ranger and 1.158 of the Bronco Sport. Obviously the images aren't perfectly aligned (esp. the Ranger image) and it's unclear whether the Maverick has it's final bumper, etc., but I think that it's a close guess and it would make sense.

The Bronco Sport has a cargo space length of 33 in behind the rear seats and a width of 41.5 in between the wheel wells, so if this is 26 inches longer, I'd expect maybe a 4.5 ft bed.
This would be ideal for me. For the second row, would you expect the leg and head space to be similar to the Bronco Sport?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

MarcusBrody

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
186
Reaction score
368
Location
Nevada
Vehicle(s)
Ford Transit Connect, BMW 318ti
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
This would be ideal for me. For the second row, would you expect the leg and head space to be similar to the Bronco Sport?
That was my assumption, but I was just going by leaked exterior photos so who knows if it's an accurate assumption.
 

Milous

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 20, 2021
Threads
14
Messages
328
Reaction score
501
Location
WA State
Vehicle(s)
2022 XLT Alto Blu, LUX, Sunroof, delivered 3/18/22
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
From these images, I'd guess the Maverick will be about ~197 to 200 in, with my guess being closer to the latter...... I'd expect maybe a 4.5 ft bed.
Not to revive an old thread, but had to give you kudos for your incredibly accurate guesses!
 

Sponsored

Nw_adventure

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 3, 2021
Threads
82
Messages
2,547
Reaction score
2,195
Location
Salt Lake city
Vehicle(s)
Honda Element/ Toyota Highlander
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Looking forward to having 199 inches of swinging sirloin in the garage soon -
 

Decayed

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
yes
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
3,126
Reaction score
4,819
Location
Directly above the center of the Earth
Vehicle(s)
a car
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Having a "no rear seat" would be great. Only thing going back there are grocery bags or Basset Hounds. If not an option, I wonder how hard it would be to remove the seat.
A couple of bolts probably. I've had all the seats out of my explorer for cleaning. It was simple. On the mav you can't remove the under seat storage bins and it's not clear how much room you would gain. OTOH you may be able to use the seat fasteners on a piece of plywood to cover them up. You could even cover the plywood with some kind of upholstery appropriate for basset hound.
 

Flomounier1

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2021
Threads
26
Messages
629
Reaction score
857
Location
Los Angeles
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
It's strange because when I first saw it in person, it was a lot bigger than I expected it to be but noticeably smaller than the ranger.

It's bigger than a pre 2011 Ranger/Tacoma, but not as big as a new ranger/GMC Canyon/Chevy Colorado.
 

Bigbill27

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Jan 23, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
331
Reaction score
376
Location
Kentucky
Vehicle(s)
2012 focus, 2023 Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Never under estimate the interior size of smaller vehicles. I've been an econobox owner since 1989, with Ford Festivas, Scion Xb 1st Gen., and Nissan Cubes. At 6 ft and at least 250# the small cars offered more head and leg room for me that most SUV and larger cars that I tried. I assume that the crewcab on the Maverck will allow me to move the front seat far enough for leg room, like my extended cab older Ranger does.
I am also a smaller car owner. I’ve had 2 focus and drive a 1997 ranger and I’m 6’6” and 340 lbs and I have plenty of head and leg room in the maverick. Even in the back seat if I am behind myself.
 

Sykotyk

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2022
Threads
16
Messages
480
Reaction score
641
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I am also a smaller car owner. I’ve had 2 focus and drive a 1997 ranger and I’m 6’6” and 340 lbs and I have plenty of head and leg room in the maverick. Even in the back seat if I am behind myself.
Is the upright seats and higher floor that gives it more room. Agreed that the backseat is much roomier than it looks
Sponsored

 
 




Top