- First Name
- Levi
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2023
- Threads
- 39
- Messages
- 1,742
- Reaction score
- 2,035
- Location
- Spring Lake Michigan
- Vehicle(s)
- 23 F150-2016 RS/ 22 GT500/ rx8 x2/ 95 mustang GT/ 17 edge.
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
So I’m not sure anyone said anything about the brand of oil except you. Hence the question. Yes motorcraft does indeed work. Never once did I say it had to be amsoil. Simply sated they were one of the first to offer it. You are really coming off as blatant against it. Not one single person in this s thread said anything about any specific brand until it was deemed an amsoil add. Which if you read the article clearly is not. Then they use a generic base stock picture of a well known oil. If they used a motorcraft picture would you have said the same thing nope.well, first of all, I checked and Motorcraft 5w-30 synthetic blend is SN+ rated so someone just following the basic maintenance schedule at their Ford dealership is going to be fine. but I just love a good technical discussion/debate despite my earlier short, flippant reply. and I definitely do not like this credit in the article: Images courtesy of Driven Racing Oil, Amsoil and Total Seal
so here goes...
there are 4 theoretical conditions identified in that article. if I may summarize:
1. carbon deposits in the intake tract detaching and forming a hot spot. could definitely happen. carbon buildup is a known issue of gas direct-injected engines.
(discussing #2 intentionally last)
3. oil and engine temp. says to warm your engine to at least 100C, obvious, yet still some don't follow this simple process.
4. lean air/fuel ratio. we know that fuel economy comes from modern engines running extremely lean at part throttle and yet surviving. this is a really good reason to run 91+ octane in your ecoboost engine, even if it's stock.
and #2 - the presence of oil.
2. tiny amounts of oil getting past the rings (it would have to be both oil and compression rings, which a healthy engine should not do) and then this mixes with atomized fuel/air and causes a hotspot.
let's think on that a moment. is oil more combustible than gasoline? clearly not. if a few microns is atomized and mixed with gas, would we really expect the flashpoint to decrease? It seems to me that the presence of oil would be more likely to lower combustion efficiency rather than cause pre-ignition.
Moving on to your point one. Like oil they state it can cause it but not the main factor. True but if a better oil and fuel is used to help reduce the carbon the better. Fact is better oils produce less vapors and evaporation than less quality oil regardless of brand or price. When they bake off it moves through your pcv system and into your intake. If we can minimize that we are one step closer to eliminating lspi.
Your point 2 assumes oil is from the oil getting past rings. Even healthy engine have that to a degree. But you are again missing the point that oil enters through the intake also through the pcv system. Both can and will cause carbon. The amount of that can be affected by how good the oil is. Far more oil gets into the combustion chamber through pcv than the rings on most newer motors.
Point 3 I’m sure we all agree on.
Point 4 is accurate also but lspi is usually the first issue causing and issue with the leaner burn. And the Oct rating simply will not affect that. Octane has zero to do with AF ratios in the terms we are talking. 91-93 only prevent detonation from timing and boost. The af ratio will be the same not matter the Octane. So the grade of fuel is not gonna save your lspi.
Hence why every RS owner was running 91-93 still had it.
Sponsored