Please explain as I am not aware of an intercooler.I, too, would be fond of this mounting position were it not for the intercooler.
Thanks.
Sponsored
Please explain as I am not aware of an intercooler.I, too, would be fond of this mounting position were it not for the intercooler.
On the ecoboost motors there is. And from what some are saying it barely keeps up so I’m afraid to block it at all tooPlease explain as I am not aware of an intercooler.
Thanks.
Good information. I'm planning to order a hybrid in June(?), so that may not be a factor for me..On the ecoboost motors there is. And from what some are saying it barely keeps up so I’m afraid to block it at all too
I'd be worried if Ford installed such a high-strung engine package into a consumer vehicle that would have issue if 10% of it's intercooler had restricted airflowI, too, would be fond of this mounting position were it not for the intercooler.
I’m not sure where you’re pulling your claims as fact from so I’m just going to ignore those. But yes, I live in the south where it’s warm so obstructing airflow needed for cooling is an awful idea.I'd be worried if Ford installed such a high-strung engine package into a consumer vehicle that would have issue if 10% of it's intercooler had restricted airflow
Kinda looks like an after toughtI am still waiting on mine but here is just one concept I did by some editing:
This is a great ideaI'll be looking into something similar to the image below using these: https://www.diodedynamics.com/stage-series-6-sae-dot-amber-light-bar-pair.html (note these are DOT approved for road use)
The percentage is a guesstimate based on the known size of the lights vs estimated size of the intercooler.I’m not sure where you’re pulling your claims as fact from so I’m just going to ignore those. But yes, I live in the south where it’s warm so obstructing airflow needed for cooling is an awful idea.
As I don't have a Maverick yet, I have no idea what is behind this false covers and if that is a viable mounting location. It just appears to me that would be a good place for fog lights. Can't say if it would or wouldn't work.I, too, would be fond of this mounting position were it not for the intercooler.
The opening for the intercooler is roughly 4” x 28”. That doesn’t account for all these vertical and horizontal plastic cross members. But just assuming that 4” x 28” is free and clear, which it isn’t, that is 112 sq. in. Your calculation of 22.75 sq. in. doesn’t account for any mounts or brackets but just going off that, those lights now would eat up over 20% of airflow. A more accurate number is probably closer to 25%.The percentage is a guesstimate based on the known size of the lights vs estimated size of the intercooler.
The lights have a combined surface area of 22.75 sq in and if the intercooler is 6"x30" then that's 180 sq in. (I don't have a truck to measure it)
22.75 / 180 = 12.6%
So if my visual estimate on the intercooler is close, then I stand by my point of Ford shouldn't be putting an engine package that will have problems if ~13% of it's intercooler has restricted airflow into a consumer vehicle. That's way too slim of a margin between "ok" and "prone to failure."
It looks like a small radiatior, mounted below the radiator. It cools off the compressed air coming from the turbo before it goes into the engine.Please explain as I am not aware of an intercooler.
Thanks.
If you are talking about the blanks where the tow hooks go, there is nothing behind there. Non FX4 trucks even lack the frame hardware where the tow hooks screw in, so it's a void. Not sure if the blanks are removable or molded in which would require cutting...As I don't have a Maverick yet, I have no idea what is behind this false covers and if that is a viable mounting location. It just appears to me that would be a good place for fog lights. Can't say if it would or wouldn't work.
Not about money, many of us don't like turbocharged engines.But that is true. You could have paid for EB and FX4.