- Thread starter
- #91
Not trolling! It is a subject worth discussing.I don’t know, maybe the OP was just trolling.![]()
Sponsored
Last edited:
Not trolling! It is a subject worth discussing.I don’t know, maybe the OP was just trolling.![]()
I think it is worth discussing. But once the consensus among the customers and those who work on them in the field is that the solid lifters are not a problem at all, the person should simply acknowledge that their fears may have been unfounded. But some continue to argue the point based on what they think will happen even though what they think will happen doesn't happen in the field, only in theoryNot trolling! It is a subject worth discussing.
That may be true of this type of engine, but it is more about the brand issues.I think it is worth discussing. But once the consensus among the customers and those who work on them in the field is that the solid lifters are not a problem at all, the person should simply acknowledge that their fears may have been unfounded. But some continue to argue the point based on what they think will happen even though what they think will happen doesn't happen in the field, only in theory
In the 1970's I had a neighbor who never changed oil. He just traded in for a new car about every 16-18:months when it hit 75-85k miles. I saw one on a lot one year with "ONE OWNER" banner on it.Have people been having problems with Maverick lifters? Any new vehicle will last 150k with regular oil changes. How many people will keep it long enough to worry about stuff like that? I put 16-18k a year on my vehicles. I’m ready for a new one in 6-8 years. Have owned many vehicles from ford to Chevy to dodge to Mitsubishi to Toyota. All I have ever had are minor problems. People work their self up over crazy stuff. Drive it and change the oil.
I thought he was going for other not otter.Spellcheck changed “Otto” to “Otter” - be we know what you meant
Maybe he gets his oil changed at a Valve Adjustment Specialist dealership?His knowledge of the Maverick is pretty much limited to his gut feeling and opinion . He said he never worked on one. He mentioned the solid lifters and stated that they'd need adjustment, and it would be expensive. This let's me know that he has little knowledge of the history of this engine design in general or the fact that this particular engine has been used in Fords for Many years. The fact that Ford doesn't even list valve adjustment in its maintenance schedule.
It's a discussion, you are creating the drama. That is a long reply.Oh the Drama !
The Horror, the Horror of it all !
My Ecoboost will choke to death on carbon,
My Eight Speed will come apart,
Solid lifters oh woe why me,
I’ve only had nine Fords, drove the shit out of each one.
Never had any problems.
My last Toyota, a $3 seal failed in the steering unit rendering the whole thing useless, that seal is not replaceable,
$1,600 later a new steering unit at 50,000 miles.
Shit Happens right !
But for some the sky must be falling.
just like you ought'ter!I thought he was going for other not otter.![]()
That may be true of this type of engine, but it is more about the brand issues.
[/QUOT
NONE of the Ford engines that use solid lifters have problems with valve adjustment in normal use. Some of the EcoBoost engines on non Maverick vehicles have head gasket issues. But NONE have a reputation for issues related to valve adjustment. . So it's a non issue. PERIOD.That may be true of this type of engine, but it is more about the brand issues.