Sponsored

Big Kahuna

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2021
Threads
80
Messages
761
Reaction score
1,417
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Found these online for turning radius

Outback 18.05'
Ford Maverick 20'
Ford Ranger 21'
Jeep Wrangler 17.25'

2 door Bronco will probably be similar to Wrangler

Going from a Honda Element to a Maverick the turning radius will be something I miss

Honda Element 17.45'

My old Chevy Silverado had a turning radius of like 30' though so 20' isn't bad :) My original reg cab ford ranger had a turning radius of 18.37'
 

Fotomoto

Well-known member
First Name
Doug
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
107
Reaction score
203
Location
South Texas
Vehicle(s)
Sienna hybrid, Lincoln Corsair GT
Engine
Undecided
Try putting a scoop of mulch in the back of the Outback at the garden center.
No thanks, I prefer bagged with a tarp on the floor for the inevitable rips.

A big hatch is capable of a lot of work.

Ford Maverick Ford Maverick vs Subaru Outback size and legroom compared IMG_2505.JPG
 

Sponsored

oljackfrost

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Mar 9, 2021
Threads
39
Messages
1,077
Reaction score
1,826
Location
Minnesota
Vehicle(s)
They're all sold, waiting for Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Sponsored

dano0726

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Daniel
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
197
Reaction score
279
Location
NW Houston
Vehicle(s)
2011 Jeep JK Wrangler Sport
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Thanks for all the turning measurement confirmations, hombres!!!

Wifey's BS Badlands turns extremely well/tight, even when compared to my 2 door Jeep (while performing the unscientific hard/90 degree left hand turn into a parking space...)
 
OP
OP
dldsm7

dldsm7

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
124
Reaction score
168
Location
Charleston
Vehicle(s)
2012 Subaru Outback
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Had a new 2015 OutBack. Yeah, rear seat room can't be compared as the subie has much more plus rear seats recline (nice). Checking specs, it looks to be a whopping 5 inches more. Don't carry passengers much so it's not a huge issue for us.

Honestly, if subaru cross-licensed more toyota hybrid tech like they did with the crosstek hybrid and put in in outback, I'd get it over the mav. hybrid as I find a large box more useful overall than a partially always open smaller box.
5” more? The AWD shown is only 2” more (legroom) - subi is 38.1 while maverick is 36.9”! I thought it would “feel closer” than it was
 
OP
OP
dldsm7

dldsm7

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
124
Reaction score
168
Location
Charleston
Vehicle(s)
2012 Subaru Outback
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I don’t drive while sitting in the backseat and I’m also going to assume that most people here will spend less than an hour in the backseat of their own Maverick. My rear seat passenger is a child and if he bitches about the legroom he can walk.
yes, however I often have friends/family coming for rides to places so having ample room is something that I highly consider.
 

abcinv

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Tommy
Joined
Aug 17, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
256
Reaction score
272
Location
NW Georgia
Vehicle(s)
'22 Maverick Hybrid XLT / '06 Tundra dbl cab 4x4 Limited
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
My 2006 Tundra (1st Gen) DBL Cab 4x4 has a turning radius of two football fields; I welcome the Maverick with open arms!
Sponsored

 
 







Top