Sponsored

LSchicago

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Lloyd
Joined
Jul 19, 2022
Threads
83
Messages
4,029
Reaction score
5,227
Location
IL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT, 99 E150 Clb Wgn, 23 Mav XL Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Test at a mile high, so a bit slower than low altitude.
Sponsored

 

heady

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
May 14, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
328
Reaction score
520
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
'25 Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
"I'll have you know this is the big block edition of the Maverick" (referring to the hybrid) 😆 funny guys! 2/10ths on the 1/4 EB vs. Hybrid, about one and a half truck lengths, nice.
 

Bigcanoe

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
78
Reaction score
106
Location
Moncure, nc
Vehicle(s)
2025 Maverick XLT, 2022 Toyota Rav4 Hybrid
Engine
Undecided
Was it a drag race? They should do a few laps at the race track too!
 

heady

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
May 14, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
328
Reaction score
520
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
'25 Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
That's a good point, Autocross or rallycross would be where slow cars like these really shine, and I bet the Lobo would stand out much more in comparison playing to its strengths on those fields!
 

Sponsored

heady

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
May 14, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
328
Reaction score
520
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
'25 Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Octane makes significantly less difference at elevation, engines don't knock as readily with a lighter air charge in the cylinders, which is why they still sell ultra low 85 octane up there in the nose bleed states :) Doubtful the Lobo was pulling timing at a mile high, but they didn't say what fuel was in it. Either way, 87 is basically 91 in those conditions, and 91, 93.
 

dalola

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Retired
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
2,522
Reaction score
4,325
Location
SE Ohio 🇺🇸
Website
sunsetridgecabinhockinghills.com
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mustang Mach-E P4X, '24 Bronco Big Bend 2Dr Sasquatch, Hot Rods
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Octane makes significantly less difference at elevation, engines don't knock as readily with a lighter air charge in the cylinders, which is why they still sell ultra low 85 octane up there in the nose bleed states :) Doubtful the Lobo was pulling timing at a mile high, but they didn't say what fuel was in it. Either way, 87 is basically 91 in those conditions, and 91, 93.
Forced induction creates basically the same cylinder pressure at various elevations, so octane still makes a significant difference. I would wager a full second reduction off their reported times with proper fuel.
 

heady

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
May 14, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
328
Reaction score
520
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
'25 Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Nope, not exactly, bit it would be nice if they didn't lose performance. They do lose less performance than a naturally aspirated vehicle, though. There's a lot of basic primers on the subject, this was just the first one I came across, it describes it fairly simply:
 

dalola

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Retired
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
2,522
Reaction score
4,325
Location
SE Ohio 🇺🇸
Website
sunsetridgecabinhockinghills.com
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mustang Mach-E P4X, '24 Bronco Big Bend 2Dr Sasquatch, Hot Rods
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Nope, not exactly, bit it would be nice if they didn't lose performance. They do lose less performance than a naturally aspirated vehicle, though. There's a lot of basic primers on the subject, this was just the first one I came across, it describes it fairly simply:
I'm not sure what you think that post illustrates? Power loss at altitude is fractional for a forced induction engine. Octane still plays a major role in performance for a FI engine because, as I said previously, cylinder pressure remains consistent under boost, regardless of altitude. Cylinder pressure creates heat, heat requires octane, octane allows full timing. It's not difficult.
 
Sponsored

BDennis

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Threads
43
Messages
806
Reaction score
880
Location
So Cal
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick hybrid & E450 Leprechaun
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
The hybrid might beat the Lobo at sea level as turbos have an advantage at altitude.
 

heady

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
May 14, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
328
Reaction score
520
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
'25 Lariat
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I'm not sure what you think that post illustrates? Power loss at altitude is fractional for a forced induction engine. Octane still plays a major role in performance for a FI engine because, as I said previously, cylinder pressure remains consistent under boost, regardless of altitude. Cylinder pressure creates heat, heat requires octane, octane allows full timing. It's not difficult.
Close, but not exactly. Heat doesn't require octane, heat-induced pre-igniton requires higher octane. Cylinder heat and charge air temperatures can actually be higher at altitude, because the air is thinner, so our intercoolers don't work as well, plus turbine speeds must increase to develop the same manifold pressure, etc. But, the critical part that suppresses knock at altitude in both NA and FI engines is the charge air, while the density is increased with FI, the charge air mass is decreased due to higher temperatures generated by the induction system. The mass flow equation used to calculate fuel injected pulls fuel out commensurate with the total reduction of mass of oxygen in the cylinder, this reduces BSFC and pulls the engine away from the spark advance knock limit. The minimum octane requirements for each engine and charge induction will vary, but the effects of altitude are non-trivial. Either way we don't conclusively know if TFL's engine pulled timing or not on the run.

Regardless, the hybrid was at a larger total disadvantage at altitude, we should run a test at a lower elevation, with the premium fuels, and see what happens!
 
 







Top