Sponsored

Hybrid MPG gauge too high by 5.6%

Craig Joyner

2.5L Hybrid
Member
First Name
Craig
Joined
May 24, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
13
Reaction score
9
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
XLT
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
In early October '24, I reset the trip monitor and started keeping detailed gas records. Tire pressure was checked/corrected each fill up. The monitor is consistently high for each fill up, by 3.4% to 6.1%.
After 5043 miles, the actual is 36.7mpg but the monitor shows 39.0, 5.6% too high. Anyone else notice this?
Is this intentional? Can it be adjusted to be more accurate?
I have a 2023 XLT Hybrid.
Sponsored

 

The Real Maverick

2.5L Hybrid
Banned
Banned
First Name
Jack
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Threads
31
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
4,143
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Yes

Yes it is intentional because everyone who tracks MPG as close as you do, including myself comes to the same conclusion that the factory setting always is 5% optimistic, or a tad more, I'm gonna say 5.5% in mine.... if monitor closely and take the long term average.

Yes you can fix this

Very few software parameters are user adjustable but Ford made the fuel economy formula easy for the lay person to adjust.

Look online for "engineering test mode" and AFE (average fuel economy) adjustment.

There is a "correction factor" anyone can adjust at home. No tools. Just button presses.

The correction factor is set to 1.000

Expressed as 1000/1000

You can change the numerator.

In your case and mine 945/1000 would take the MPG and multiply it by 945/1000 or, be a 5.5% reduction.

Now, what I see on the dash matches what I see at the pump.

Of course all your "miles to empty" estimates are now that much better too.

https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...t-via-engineering-test-mode.58342/post-983941
 
Last edited:

MavMeister25

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2025
Threads
28
Messages
229
Reaction score
493
Location
South USA
Vehicle(s)
‘25 Ford Maverick XL
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Yes

Yes it is intentional because everyone who tracks MPG as close as you do, including myself comes to the same conclusion that the factory setting always is 5% optimistic, or a tad more, I'm gonna say 5.5% in mine.... if monitor closely and take the long term average.

Yes you can fix this

Very few software parameters are user adjustable but Ford made the fuel economy formula easy for the lay person to adjust.

Look online for "engineering test mode" and AFE (average fuel economy) adjustment.

There is a "correction factor" anyone can adjust at home. No tools. Just button presses.

The correction factor is set to 1.000

Expressed as 1000/1000

You can change the numerator.

In your case and mine 945/1000 would take the MPG and multiply it by 945/1000 or, be a 5.5% reduction.

Now, what I see on the dash matches what I see at the pump.

Of course all your "miles to empty" estimates are now that much better too.

https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...t-via-engineering-test-mode.58342/post-983941
Great info. Do you know if this adjusts PRIOR mpg data? Like if you have the Trip 1 data going back up to 5000 miles, will it retroactively adjust that to the correction factor or does it only affect data from that point onward?
 
OP
OP

Craig Joyner

2.5L Hybrid
Member
First Name
Craig
Joined
May 24, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
13
Reaction score
9
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
XLT
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Yes

Yes it is intentional because everyone who tracks MPG as close as you do, including myself comes to the same conclusion that the factory setting always is 5% optimistic, or a tad more, I'm gonna say 5.5% in mine.... if monitor closely and take the long term average.

Yes you can fix this

Very few software parameters are user adjustable but Ford made the fuel economy formula easy for the lay person to adjust.

Look online for "engineering test mode" and AFE (average fuel economy) adjustment.

There is a "correction factor" anyone can adjust at home. No tools. Just button presses.

The correction factor is set to 1.000

Expressed as 1000/1000

You can change the numerator.

In your case and mine 945/1000 would take the MPG and multiply it by 945/1000 or, be a 5.5% reduction.

Now, what I see on the dash matches what I see at the pump.

Of course all your "miles to empty" estimates are now that much better too.

https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/f...t-via-engineering-test-mode.58342/post-983941
Thanks
 

scottjl

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2025
Threads
12
Messages
454
Reaction score
966
Location
Midwest USA
Vehicle(s)
'25 Lariat Eruption Green, 4k, BAP
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
just want to recommend the app "fuelly" and their web site https://www.fuelly.com for tracking fill-ups and everything else. i've been using it for years and years with all our vehicles. it's interesting getting insight into how much you're paying not only for gas but service, and you can compare yourself to other users.
 

Sponsored

Master Blaster

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Master
Joined
Feb 20, 2024
Threads
8
Messages
1,302
Reaction score
1,918
Location
Toronto
Vehicle(s)
23 Maverick Lariat Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
About 2-3% of that difference is because you are measuring in Winter. The gast station pumps short-change you by volume on the assumption that the fuel is colder and therefore more dense. Its B.S., but they've been doing it for about 40 years now...
 
OP
OP

Craig Joyner

2.5L Hybrid
Member
First Name
Craig
Joined
May 24, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
13
Reaction score
9
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
XLT
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
just want to recommend the app "fuelly" and their web site https://www.fuelly.com for tracking fill-ups and everything else. i've been using it for years and years with all our vehicles. it's interesting getting insight into how much you're paying not only for gas but service, and you can compare yourself to other users.
Thanks
 

Waterick

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
2,097
Reaction score
2,587
Location
Laurens county SC
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mav Lariat, '14 Prius, '83 'Stang, more...
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Great info. Do you know if this adjusts PRIOR mpg data? Like if you have the Trip 1 data going back up to 5000 miles, will it retroactively adjust that to the correction factor or does it only affect data from that point onward?
Only going forward. When I reset mine, my long term mileage stayed the same initially and then started going lower with the newer miles.
 

MavMeister25

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2025
Threads
28
Messages
229
Reaction score
493
Location
South USA
Vehicle(s)
‘25 Ford Maverick XL
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I’ve noticed my % of actual mpg in relationship to the displayed mpg varies depending on the gas station I fill up at. I always set the pump handle to the lower setting and once it stops, I don’t fill up anymore. I suspect some stations have a lower sensor or higher sensor depending on the nozzle. At some fillups my discrepancy is only 1.5% while at other fillups it’s been as high as 7%. I know I’m measuring correctly and repeating the same process every time. To me the only variable is the pump. It can’t be the varying outside temperature (etc) since this is a shared factor that plays out in BOTH the actual and displayed mpg—so it wouldn’t explain fluctuations in % discrepancy between actual and displayed.

Thoughts?
 

Waterick

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
2,097
Reaction score
2,587
Location
Laurens county SC
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mav Lariat, '14 Prius, '83 'Stang, more...
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
@MavMeister25
Yes, your on the right track in your thoughts. I believe even differing pumps at the same station will give you variations. Some stations are built on slight inclines (not quite level) and will click off differently at the same pump depending on the direction you are facing. Even when using same pump and facing same direction there are factors that I would think may cause the pump to click off differently (temperature, wear, ECT). This is why to get a reasonably accurate MPG reading you need to average several fill ups.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored

The Real Maverick

2.5L Hybrid
Banned
Banned
First Name
Jack
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Threads
31
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
4,143
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
About 2-3% of that difference is because you are measuring in Winter. The gast station pumps short-change you by volume on the assumption that the fuel is colder and therefore more dense. Its B.S., but they've been doing it for about 40 years now...
No.
This is a myth, a long held myth but a myth none the less.

Gas is held underground where the temperature changes very little year round.

A pump in Duluth MN will be calibrated a little differently than a pump in Phoenix, AZ since their ground temperatures are a little different.
But the Duluth pump is consistent year round as is the Phoenix one. Within a penny per tankful.
 

dochawk

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
doc
Joined
Jul 17, 2024
Threads
34
Messages
1,682
Reaction score
1,574
Location
Las Vegas
Vehicle(s)
hybrid '25 lariat, 4 classic Cadillacs, Miata, mustang gt convertible
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Is there any consistent variance based on tire differences between trim levels on the hybrids?

If not, I'm perfectly happy to just use 5.5%!
:crackup:

The chances of my actually logging enough to get a more accurate numbrer are, well . . . (let alone actually downloading an app!)
 

The Real Maverick

2.5L Hybrid
Banned
Banned
First Name
Jack
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Threads
31
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
4,143
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Is there any consistent variance based on tire differences between trim levels on the hybrids?

If not, I'm perfectly happy to just use 5.5%!
:crackup:

The chances of my actually logging enough to get a more accurate numbrer are, well . . . (let alone actually downloading an app!)
Probably not.

I do run 2-4 psi extra.
37 to 39 psi

Perfectly safe. Better MPG. Better tread life.
 
 







Top