SWEET !!!!! I love the Ranger's also, sends me back in time to 1987 with my v6 xlt extended cab ranger. Put 200K on it, the only thing I had to do to it was routine maintenance stuff and common wear items - brakes, tires, belts.
Sponsored
Sponsored
So long
- Thread starter My new truck
- Start date
- Watchers 10
Nice looking Ranger, here are the stats on rear legroom
The Ranger feels bigger, there is more leg room in the back seat, especially behind the driver seat.
Maverick Rear Legroom: 35.9 inches (Hybrid) / 36.9 inches (2.0L/EcoBoost).
Ranger Rear Legroom: ~34.6 inches (Crew Cab/SuperCrew)
Close but surprisingly the Maverick has a little more.
Brian
- First Name
- Heman
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2023
- Threads
- 48
- Messages
- 989
- Reaction score
- 714
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Vehicle(s)
- 2023 XLT Maverick
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
I thought so, and maybe side to side, shoulder room.
- First Name
- Mark
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2025
- Threads
- 25
- Messages
- 1,443
- Reaction score
- 1,494
- Location
- Ravenna,Ohio
- Vehicle(s)
- 2025 Maverick XLT AWD
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
IMO the Maverick looks Nicer. I drove a newer Ranger Years ago with the 2.3 EB but think the 2025 AWD XLT Maverick I have with the 2.0 EB ran stronger than the Ranger.
glad we got this perspective
Sponsored
- First Name
- Cal
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2021
- Threads
- 27
- Messages
- 6,029
- Reaction score
- 11,824
- Location
- Ohio...but I'd rather be in Boone.
- Vehicle(s)
- 2025 Hybrid AWD Lariat
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
But you see, the Ranger FEELS bigger so it is…
- First Name
- Mark
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2025
- Threads
- 25
- Messages
- 1,443
- Reaction score
- 1,494
- Location
- Ravenna,Ohio
- Vehicle(s)
- 2025 Maverick XLT AWD
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
Was this sarcasm?
I hope you like your new Ranger like I do. Had mine since March If you have any questions about your Ranger that you don't understand I might be able to help. And here's a Maverick also.
Sponsored
Last edited:
