I don't tow
Sponsored
I don't need a "go harder" Maverick.I tow, so what's your point? Just curious.
![]()
I get it. That being said should a company make and sell something for a few. Or possibly make something and sell that would include a larger portion of society? This way or the way it stands now both are pleased and are willing to purchase the Maverick, those that tow and those that do not. I think from a company or manufacturing viewpoint it makes sense to reach a broader market share. JMHO especially if they want to stay in business and to stay profitable.I don't need a "go harder" Maverick.
As the title says.
If I would need a truck to tow, a F450 should fits better, but I don't tow
I feel 'ya We're just old fart folks driving a Maverick 'cause We ain't need no a big truck anymoreI get it. That being said should a company make and sell something for a few. Or possibly make something and sell that would include a larger portion of society? This way or the way it stands now both are pleased and are willing to purchase the Maverick, those that tow and those that do not. I think from a company or manufacturing viewpoint it makes sense to reach a broader market share. JMHO especially if they want to stay in business and to stay profitable.
Many car or vehicle manufacturers have came and went. Right now a company that has been in business for a while is struggling at least that's the last I heard about a year ago Nissan. Sorry but it's a "dog est dog world" out there.
Speak for yourself. I still need or could use a big truck. I just want the convenience, ride, handling and fuel economy. On the old fart, I totally agree. You have a great day.I feel 'ya We're just old fart folks driving a Maverick 'cause We ain't need no a big truck anymore
Maverick is Ford's current entry-level vehicle. It will likely remain simple and affordable (yes, the price has gone up, but it's still cheaper than practically everything else on the market, and Ford does not exist in a vacuum).I get it. That being said should a company make and sell something for a few. Or possibly make something and sell that would include a larger portion of society? This way or the way it stands now both are pleased and are willing to purchase the Maverick, those that tow and those that do not. I think from a company or manufacturing viewpoint it makes sense to reach a broader market share. JMHO especially if they want to stay in business and to stay profitable.
Many car or vehicle manufacturers have came and went. Right now a company that has been in business for a while is struggling at least that's the last I heard about a year ago Nissan. Sorry but it's a "dog est dog world" out there.
I agree but even with an entry level one can add trims and options increasing the price. This offers again, a broader market share.Maverick is Ford's current entry-level vehicle. It will likely remain simple and affordable (yes, the price has gone up, but it's still cheaper than practically everything else on the market, and Ford does not exist in a vacuum).
I loved the dual-swing tailgate, the security of the in-bed trunk, the 40/60 flip up back seat with storage you could access from the side door. The Maverick underseat storage does not work for me at all because I often have an Intermediate or Large Ruffland dog crate on it. I'm looking at doing a seat-delete for more usable back-seat room. Never considered that for the Ridgeline. I could also stack two Intermediate dog crates in back of the Ridgeline with the rear seat folded (and still have room for a passenger on the single seat). The Ridgeline was 6" longer, a few inches higher and 5" fatter. MPG was not great and it was a chore in parking garages (not that I cared if anyone dinged it since it was a 2012). If the Ridgeline had a hybrid and 360 camera, I'd probably go back to one.On my case I love the maverick, but, but I love the look and functionality of the Ridgeline, the main problem is the fuel consumption, I talked to few ppl on person and they told me that they're in the 14-18mpg, so do I, I never been able to get 20mpg in my 2022 EB, but I barely hit the xpressway my drive is 90% local road with the stop and go all they long, the Ridgeline give 14-18 on combine escenarios, about the ground clearang I never scraped my maverick so I guess the RL is pretty close too.
The real seat area is mega clever, and the freaking bed is awesome, the Ridgeline is becoming a dinosaur with the same V6 and no incremental gains at all.
That said, If you give me for free both vehicles to pick one my head would xplode, but I think I might go for the RL.
Feel like you didn’t actually read my post, lol.I don't need a "go harder" Maverick.
As the title says.
If I would need a truck to tow, a F450 should fits better, but I don't tow
So where's the picture of your new Maverick?Feel like you didn’t actually read my post, lol.
I don’t care about the towing. I am saying that they advertise the flexbed and the fits system and I wish they would double down on these things. Putting out a few 3d models in 2022 is not supporting it.
I just thinking taking an approach like slate that is very DIY friendly and going harder into that approach would be great.
Awesome, again congratulations on your new Maverick.
I got my eyes since like 2013,and it might sound crazy but think that 2nd Gen was so radical that still on my head, if I could get an used one for a good price and we'll maintain would be tempting, but also read that one had some headaches on it own, so no way jose.I loved the dual-swing tailgate, the security of the in-bed trunk, the 40/60 flip up back seat with storage you could access from the side door. The Maverick underseat storage does not work for me at all because I often have an Intermediate or Large Ruffland dog crate on it. I'm looking at doing a seat-delete for more usable back-seat room. Never considered that for the Ridgeline. I could also stack two Intermediate dog crates in back of the Ridgeline with the rear seat folded (and still have room for a passenger on the single seat). The Ridgeline was 6" longer, a few inches higher and 5" fatter. MPG was not great and it was a chore in parking garages (not that I cared if anyone dinged it since it was a 2012). If the Ridgeline had a hybrid and 360 camera, I'd probably go back to one.