Sponsored

How much do larger tires affect MPG

maverickeric

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
E
Joined
Jul 14, 2022
Threads
9
Messages
52
Reaction score
90
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
F150 + Maverick XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
My XL is about to arrive and first thing to go are the XL steelies. I'm looking at two aftermarket wheel/tire setups:

245/65/17 BFG AT (45lbs) + 25lb wheels = 70lbs per combo
245/65/17 Nitto Grappler (34lbs) + 21 lb wheels = 55 lbs combo.
Stock 225/65/17 (24lbs?) + 27lb steelies = 51 lb stock setup?

Does anyone have a ballpark idea on how much the two would affect MPG, even compared to stock on an EB AWD? There's no calculator for this - which is understandable considering there's a lot of variables (overall size and where the weight on the combo is). 10 lbs extra weight in the BFG AT TIRE sounds significant though. Only considering the BFG because I could probably get the BFG wheel/tire combo with 13k miles on them for half the price of the light weight setup ($800 vs $1600 respectively).
Sponsored

 

fossil

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
ernie
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Threads
48
Messages
3,432
Reaction score
5,792
Location
ohio
Vehicle(s)
95 SVT Cobra Mustang, HPR Lariat Tremor
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Quite a list of variables. You might need to tap into the latest version of AI for an answer.
 

kpomeraning

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Keith
Joined
Nov 23, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
108
Reaction score
142
Location
Akron, OH
Vehicle(s)
'22 Mav on order, '17 Focus, '16 Focus, '09 Fusion
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
It's not just weight - you're also increasing contact area so by nature you're likely increasing friction. Depending on the formulation of the rubber tire, you could also increase the coefficient of friction (a softer rubber versus a harder rubber) and the joys mu value calculations F/N.
 

AutobahnSHO

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Will
Joined
Oct 11, 2021
Threads
18
Messages
2,113
Reaction score
2,277
Location
S.Carolina
Vehicle(s)
Maverick, Miata
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I think I read somewhere long ago 1 lb of rotational mass is 7lbs of vehicle mass, in terms of power to push it (and wear on brakes)...
 

801dute

2.0L EcoBoost
Active member
Joined
Mar 30, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
34
Reaction score
75
Location
SLC, UT
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick - XLT AWD LUX 4K Tow
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I put on 235 65 r17 Toyo AT3 and lost about 1-2 mpg depending on driving conditions. Worth it for me for the extra grip in winter and muddy conditions. I do a fair number of long road trips and you never know when that late spring winter storm (or early October winter storm) will hit. Getting about 24 city / 29 highway. I did get 30 highway on one road trip, but it was mostly 55mph zones and not much freeway.

Most importantly, they look cooler :cool:
 

Sponsored

Johnkn

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
73
Messages
2,286
Reaction score
3,401
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Raptor, TRX, Viper, 66 Shelby, 68.5 CJ Mustang, Pantera
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
OP, If you are referencing Nitto Ridge Grapplers, you may want to re-check the weight. RGs are a great tire, however they are typically some of the heaviest by size.

good luck...
 

Johnkn

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
73
Messages
2,286
Reaction score
3,401
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Raptor, TRX, Viper, 66 Shelby, 68.5 CJ Mustang, Pantera
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Quite a list of variables. You might need to tap into the latest version of AI for an answer.
Sorry, AI is temporarily on hold.. LOL

:ROFLMAO:

.
 

LeatherPants

2.0L EcoBoost
Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 26, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
24
Reaction score
72
Location
Kissimmee, FL
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
An important consideration is that unless you edit your vehicles computer, the larger distance you travel per tire revolution isn't going to be translated by the stock vehicle computer. Reasonably expect your stock computer to register a lower MPG with bigger tires - they are probably heavier, lifted your truck somewhat, and probably have a greater rolling resistance than the street-friendly stock tires. But if you want to "old skool" figure it out, look at the revolutions per mile of your stock size versus the revs per mile of your bigger tire and apply that percentage to what your stock computer reports. That's your REAL MPG. SPOILER: You'll almost certainly lose some MPG, but it'll be somewhat less than what your computer reports. Weigh and balance, and manage your expectations. If you're a short distance traveler, the "satisfaction" factor is likely worth it. If you pound miles on your truck, it might pop an eyebrow how much your economy truck just got expensive to operate. :)
 

Snowbird

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Threads
20
Messages
574
Reaction score
490
Location
Vermont/North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
Honda CRV 2018
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
An important consideration is that unless you edit your vehicles computer, the larger distance you travel per tire revolution isn't going to be translated by the stock vehicle computer. Reasonably expect your stock computer to register a lower MPG with bigger tires - they are probably heavier, lifted your truck somewhat, and probably have a greater rolling resistance than the street-friendly stock tires. But if you want to "old skool" figure it out, look at the revolutions per mile of your stock size versus the revs per mile of your bigger tire and apply that percentage to what your stock computer reports. That's your REAL MPG. SPOILER: You'll almost certainly lose some MPG, but it'll be somewhat less than what your computer reports. Weigh and balance, and manage your expectations. If you're a short distance traveler, the "satisfaction" factor is likely worth it. If you pound miles on your truck, it might pop an eyebrow how much your economy truck just got expensive to operate. :)
One of the best posts I have read, regardless of forum topic!
 

Steve Urquell

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 8, 2023
Threads
12
Messages
404
Reaction score
824
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2023 XLT AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I went to Nitto 235/65-17 108 load range 34lb tires vs the stock 225 Conti 23lb bicycle tires and lost exactly 1/2mpg. 26.7 to 26.2 mpg.

I had to change due to the Contis having flats all the time due to the bicyle tire construction. It would not tolerate my 1.5 miles of dirt road/3 miles daily.
Sponsored

 
 







Top