I will say that I see your perspective. And your arguments have validity. I am in complete agreement on the last paragraph, this is a bad business move and there is no telling how it would shaken out in court. I'm actually shocked GM would take the flack over this fall out, canceling a warranty surely is a worse image than an artificially inflated price (which shows that it is a desired commodity).You are right about Mfgs not being able to dictate where you get your oil changed but that aspect does not apply here. The mfgs can and do dictate oil viscosity, spark plug specks, tranny oil weight, coolant, airconditioner refrigerant etc. Along with mileage and time frame for services to be done. If you deviate from anyone of those you may lose the warranty on that part.
If Ford or Chevy decide that for your vehicle to stay warranted they can put a time frame that you must keep that vehicle registered to you. Say one year. They can also just decide their warranties are not transferable. Plenty of products on the market that do that now though not in their best interest to do that.
You are right it will be challenged in court if it happens and who knows which way it will go. I dont think Ford or Chevy will go there though. Bad for business.
But ultimately I disagree that a manufacturer can force the hand of owners through shoe horning punative gotcha clauses in the warranty. The laws were put in place to prevent this kind of thing, and I think it will be found in conflict with the Magnusun-Moss act. Just my opinion of course, and these types of things are why lawyers exist and good ones make obscene money.
Sponsored