This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how things work. But please, do cite the relevant laws and their jurisdiction over this process.It's against the law to offer a product for a sales price and change the price at time of sale. At least in the US (and I can't imagine other developed countries not having a similar protection as the notoriously business-friendly US). This would be a bait & switch. There are federal & state laws to prevent this.
An error in the order system could be an solved via an immediate note to allow a customer to change the paint or agree to the higher price, certainly not waiting until delivery.
The dealer buys the vehicle from Ford. It's widely understood by the dealers that pricing is subject to change at the time of production. Invoice and MSRP may end up higher than what it was originally quoted at. This happens all the time and with the lobbying power of NADA and the like, if this were a legal concern, it wouldn't be any longer.
The consumer then buys the vehicle from the dealer. It's between the dealer and customer to agree on a selling price. Unless the customer, on a retail order, has a firm OTD price in writing, signed by the relevant manager at the dealer (sales manager or GM/principal, generally), then the customer does not have an agreed price.
The consumer, unless otherwise noted in documentation between dealer and consumer, is not obligated in any way to purchase the ordered vehicle upon arrival. If it's even produced, since the manufacturer certainly makes no guarantees that will happen (see the unfulfilled 2022 Maverick orders that had to be reordered as an example). Without a firm OTD price in writing, signed by a manager with the legal authority to bind the dealer into a contract, the consumer is at the mercy of the dealer to sell the vehicle for any given price.
Simply putting in a retail order and receiving a printout with the MSRP listed at the time of order does not create any obligations on anyone's behalf. Not that the manufacturer fulfill the order or maintain the original pricing, not that the dealer sell the vehicle - if produced - for any given price.
Oh, and in this case, it's an obvious mistake from the start that a reasonable customer would expect to be caught and not honored. After all, it was clearly documented everywhere - order guide, build & price, etc. - that the additional cost paint options were additional cost paint options.
If you feel your dealer misled you, then feel free to take it up with them to see what they're willing to do to make it right. If they have any integrity and they neglected to advise you of this situation, then they may absorb some of the cost. But they could just as easily tell you that it is what it is and not even pass along any price protection from Ford, instead selling at a higher revised MSRP, and without a signed contract, there would be no relevant laws for your lawyer to pursue.
Sponsored