Sponsored

TFL compares Maverick Tremor vs Tacoma

cavemold

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
JC
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Threads
71
Messages
2,276
Reaction score
1,538
Location
Cailforina
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick 2022 Eco 2.0
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost

Tremor has more space , and more payload . Better Mpg as well
Sponsored

 

Old Ranchero

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Apr 1, 2021
Threads
26
Messages
2,587
Reaction score
3,511
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
2018 F-150 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2022 Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
there's already another thread on this going... ;)
 

Old Ranchero

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Apr 1, 2021
Threads
26
Messages
2,587
Reaction score
3,511
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
2018 F-150 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2022 Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I only opened 1 with TFL in title where people rightly pointed out it was not a valid comparison of vehicle types. Then saw similar TFL subject title. If you thought differences were significant enough to start a new thread, Rock on Garth!
 

Maverickman74

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Shane
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Threads
65
Messages
5,598
Reaction score
7,793
Location
Maui HI
Vehicle(s)
96 Bronco, 91 Comanche, 93 ZJ, 80 Eagle, Bicycle
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
OOOOh I cant wait to see the comparisons off road. I bet the Maverick does nearly everything the Taco does. I watched a video the other day of the Badlands Bronco Sport(Tremor benefactor) totally smacking down a Santa Cruz . These Fords punch way above their class. Out here in Maui its a sea of Tacos literally 70% of the people I know drive them. Now they dont even compare to my Comanche but thats too rough for most of them. I cant wait to see how well the Tremor does out here.

Also looking at that intro shot on the video. Just Imagine the difference with a 2" lift kit and 245/70s or 255/70s on the Maverick. I calculated this combo a while back for the approach angles and such and it was something like 2-3 degrees all around. Ground clearance would also be up 2.25". Ofcourse that is an upgrade that would cost less than $1000 after you sold the 235 Falkens. Still would be $12,000 cheaper than the Taco.

Another fun fact. One of the things we want out of our Tremor is to take our nieces and nephew offroading with us. With the Tacos payload capacity we would not be able to bring the fridge/freezer, or chairs, or the dogs, or lunch, or even recovery gear because we would be overloaded. With me, my wife, 3 kids, and 2 dogs, we would still have about 150lbs of legit cargo capacity. Plus its bigger inside.
 

Sponsored

fossil

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
ernie
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Threads
48
Messages
3,432
Reaction score
5,792
Location
ohio
Vehicle(s)
95 SVT Cobra Mustang, HPR Lariat Tremor
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
OOOOh I cant wait to see the comparisons off road. I bet the Maverick does nearly everything the Taco does. I watched a video the other day of the Badlands Bronco Sport(Tremor benefactor) totally smacking down a Santa Cruz . These Fords punch way above their class. Out here in Maui its a sea of Tacos literally 70% of the people I know drive them. Now they dont even compare to my Comanche but thats too rough for most of them. I cant wait to see how well the Tremor does out here.

Also looking at that intro shot on the video. Just Imagine the difference with a 2" lift kit and 245/70s or 255/70s on the Maverick. I calculated this combo a while back for the approach angles and such and it was something like 2-3 degrees all around. Ground clearance would also be up 2.25". Ofcourse that is an upgrade that would cost less than $1000 after you sold the 235 Falkens. Still would be $12,000 cheaper than the Taco.

Another fun fact. One of the things we want out of our Tremor is to take our nieces and nephew offroading with us. With the Tacos payload capacity we would not be able to bring the fridge/freezer, or chairs, or the dogs, or lunch, or even recovery gear because we would be overloaded. With me, my wife, 3 kids, and 2 dogs, we would still have about 150lbs of legit cargo capacity. Plus its bigger inside.
I know they said the ground clearance is similar but we'd have to be blind to ignore the belly clearance on the TRD. Break over angle must be lots better than Mav.
 

bgn

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
3,016
Reaction score
5,624
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
What a weird comparison. Apples and oranges.
 

Maverickman74

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Shane
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Threads
65
Messages
5,598
Reaction score
7,793
Location
Maui HI
Vehicle(s)
96 Bronco, 91 Comanche, 93 ZJ, 80 Eagle, Bicycle
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I know they said the ground clearance is similar but we'd have to be blind to ignore the belly clearance on the TRD. Break over angle must be lots better than Mav.
Thats the Mavericks worst metric for sure. Even rear overhang can be overcome with skilled/careless driving, but breakover will stick ya everytime. Thats the main reason the Maverick need a 2" f/r lift aswell as 31s. That will drastically bring up the belly. Air bags in the rear might not be a bad idea for really rocky trails aswell. Im gonna get em just to offset the topper(need it for my pups).
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
 







Top