- Thread starter
- #16
They didn’t do 87 because I already had 93 in the tank.About ready to pull the trigger on this, only wish they would have showed a 87 octane also.
Sponsored
They didn’t do 87 because I already had 93 in the tank.About ready to pull the trigger on this, only wish they would have showed a 87 octane also.
That was in FWD, back shaft was removed as the dyno was not a 4WD dyno.Are those Dyno numbers with awd or fwd? Any mods?
Wow those are still very promising numbers! Mods would bump that up quite a bitThat was in FWD, back shaft was removed as the dyno was not a 4WD dyno.
No mods of any kind.
Issue is the turbo is the limiting factor right now. So improving upon those numbers without a bigger turbo, which I am looking into, will be difficult.Wow those are still very promising numbers! Mods would bump that up quite a bit
Why?About ready to pull the trigger on this, only wish they would have showed a 87 octane also.
I mean it’s pretty blatantly clear?Why?
I would reach out to them, Casey has likely designed an 87 tune using the collected data. He could probably provide some info.I mean it’s pretty blatantly clear?
I plan to use 87 octane and would like to see the gains The tune provides on 87 octane?
There will be no gains on 87 octane. You’re welcome.I mean it’s pretty blatantly clear?
I plan to use 87 octane and would like to see the gains The tune provides on 87 octane?
yes there will. They won’t be big numbers but the curve can still be optimizedThere will be no gains on 87 octane. You’re welcome.
we have an Expedition for towing so the Mav is our fun car and only will haul if I need a bed to get the job done.That "Tow" curve is awesome!
Personally I would be less excited about the "performance" one but each to their own.
We can disagree here. I’d have to see the results to become a believer.yes there will. They won’t be big numbers but the curve can still be optimized
I know its not a 2.0 but check out the curves BCB and others have for the F150 on 87. Again nothing drastic but cleaned up curve.We can disagree here. I’d have to see the results to become a believer.
87 octane and tune shouldn’t be used in the same sentence imo.
I don't mean for actual towing. It just looks like it's a lot more fun to drive with grunt everywhere. The performance curve actually has less power than stock until half way up the tachometer.we have an Expedition for towing so the Mav is our fun car and only will haul if I need a bed to get the job done.