Sponsored

Think I saw a 2025 Maverick

Area51BS

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Ron
Joined
Oct 11, 2021
Threads
92
Messages
800
Reaction score
1,112
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
As compared to what other overpriced vehicle?
I’m with you on the groceries. Along with about everything else being over priced and built like crap.

Even with the 'overpriced' vehicles we have now if you adjust for inflation they are cheaper than 90's vehicles. The '22 Maverick launched at what the Model T cost, if I remember correctly.

I am more worried about the pricing trends of groceries than the pricing trends of vehicles. I think we should all consider ourselves lucky to even have new vehicles to complain about.

1st World.
2 years in and the XL hybrid comes in at about 28k. Was 20.
My 22 Lariat AWD was 31k. Same one is now 37k.
My Bronco cost more now. But didn’t jump anywhere near that much.
Sponsored

 

Scott Asheville

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Scott
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Threads
79
Messages
2,330
Reaction score
5,483
Location
Asheville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2022 AWD XLT ECO LUX CP360 HPR
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I did a posting some months ago comparing my 2022 Maverick XLT Lux AWD CP360 to my truly primitive 2010 Ford Ranger. I mathematically demonstrated (I used the BLS inflation calculator) that my 2022 Maverick, adjusted for content and inflation, cost me significantly less than my 2010 Ranger XLT with vastly less content. And that's for an amazingly better vehicle. I dare anyone to go for a drive in my 2010 Ranger XLT RWD 4-cyl manual, then drive my 2022 Maverick AWD XLT ecoboost and say the Ranger was the better deal.

It truly blew my mind that Ford was able to deliver the Maverick so cheap. No doubt, not building it in a UAW plant helped, but still it's an achievement.

And I'm not a Ford fanboy either. I just credit where it's due.
 

Gonzo chris

Banned
Banned
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
635
Location
Bucks county PA
Vehicle(s)
Infiniti g35 coupe, VW Golf
Engine
Undecided
I did a posting some months ago comparing my 2022 Maverick XLT Lux AWD CP360 to my truly primitive 2010 Ford Ranger. I mathematically demonstrated (I used the BLS inflation calculator) that my 2022 Maverick, adjusted for content and inflation, cost me significantly less than my 2010 Ranger XLT with vastly less content. And that's for an amazingly better vehicle. I dare anyone to go for a drive in my 2010 Ranger XLT RWD 4-cyl manual, then drive my 2022 Maverick AWD XLT ecoboost and say the Ranger was the better deal.

It truly blew my mind that Ford was able to deliver the Maverick so cheap. No doubt, not building it in a UAW plant helped, but still it's an achievement.

And I'm not a Ford fanboy either. I just credit where it's due.
I guess, but that's kind of true of most products. Like televisions, you can get a 75-in 4K TV for less than $1,000. So you're comparing a 12-year-older vehicle to the Maverick.
 

Scott Asheville

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Scott
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Threads
79
Messages
2,330
Reaction score
5,483
Location
Asheville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2022 AWD XLT ECO LUX CP360 HPR
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Valid point, but apples to apples, my 3 Miatas (NA, NB, NC) were not that different from the newest Miata. I could swapped one for the other and had the same experience. Ranger to Maverick, it was shocking. In fairness, Ford milked that 1980s Ranger platform right to the very end. It was a pretty horrific vehicle, but it served a purpose.
 

cyberdog

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Ray
Joined
Oct 15, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
663
Reaction score
785
Location
08084
Vehicle(s)
2023 Maverick Lariat Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Shame the OP doesn't have a 4k or 2k dashcam installed. I'd have been pulling the footage at the first opportunity. :)
 

Sponsored

PNWMaverick

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2022
Threads
5
Messages
618
Reaction score
979
Location
Pacific Northwest
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Hybrid - RIP
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I did a posting some months ago comparing my 2022 Maverick XLT Lux AWD CP360 to my truly primitive 2010 Ford Ranger. I mathematically demonstrated (I used the BLS inflation calculator) that my 2022 Maverick, adjusted for content and inflation, cost me significantly less than my 2010 Ranger XLT with vastly less content. And that's for an amazingly better vehicle. I dare anyone to go for a drive in my 2010 Ranger XLT RWD 4-cyl manual, then drive my 2022 Maverick AWD XLT ecoboost and say the Ranger was the better deal.

It truly blew my mind that Ford was able to deliver the Maverick so cheap. No doubt, not building it in a UAW plant helped, but still it's an achievement.

And I'm not a Ford fanboy either. I just credit where it's due.
We ran 2010 and 2011 (last year) Rangers for our fleet vehicles. Sport trim; extended cab, 4x4, vinyl flooring (bliss!). We paid $19.9K out the door on each of the Rangers when we purchased them as a group, new. Using BLS that is right about $28.8K today.

In our use case the Maverick would have been the better vehicle by a large margin.
 

A Dodge that drives Fords

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jul 30, 2021
Threads
26
Messages
777
Reaction score
876
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
Ford Taurus Ford Ranger
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
 







Top