I happened to have parked next to a sport Trac up sat my in-laws on the weekend, and had checked out the specs. I was surprised how small the bed is, 6 inches shorter than the maverick, despite being the same total length as my ranger!I'm excited at what I see with the Maverick, but not sure at this point it is enough to make me get rid of my '03 Explorer Sport Trac. I really like the idea of a 40mpg hybrid but..
-The ST is paid for - no car payments
- The ST is very close to the size of the Maverick with a 4ft bed.
-The ST has a more powerful V6 engine.
-The ST has on-demand 4WD. (And is a beast even in heavy snow).
- The ST probably has a bigger rear seating area.
- The ST is an XLT model with all the power goodies, power rear window, cruise, etc.
- The ST has about 136K miles
- Other than a few minor transmission leaks, the ST still runs great.
Yeah...I'm excited about the Maverick, but did I mention the Sport Trac is paid for?I love the new tech on the Maverick and would love to get 40mpg, but just can't see getting rid of something that in many ways very similar, in a few ways better equipped, is a solid 4WD performer, and has been very good to me. A major mechanical failure could quickly change my mind but right now I'm not getting in the order line.
I also noticed that whether you compare the hybrid to the v6, or the 2.0 to the V8, the maverick beats both engines on power to weight, it is almost 1,000lbs lighter! Even with the 2.0 you'll probably get 6-8mpg better thank the sport Trac!
I'd probably be in the same boat with keeping my ranger, if it weren't for the fact that my wife simply hates riding in it (and we are looking at going down to 1 vehicle), and right now I can trade it for about 10% more than I paid for it in December 2019.
Sponsored