To me the Tremor is the version that makes the least sense. Less utility, worse gas milage just for a little better off roading over the FX4. Just doesn't seem like a good deal..
Sponsored
Same. 42 and change OTD for me. In fairness though, and I've posted this elsewhere, I was looking at a Bronco that would have been about 70k OTD before I drove my son's Maverick and decided it could do 90% of what I'd do in the Bronco for 2/3's the price. Seemed like a bargain to us.Same here 42k out the door, no mark up, I just wanted an xlt but couldn't find one. Its kinda nice having an option maxed out vehicle, never done that before.
Ultimately why I didn't go with the Tremor. Was very close and then decided that I'm far more likely to need to pull 4k then I am to ever do any "real" off-roading. Same reason the Mav made sense over the Bronco.To me the Tremor is the version that makes the least sense. Less utility, worse gas milage just for a little better off roading over the FX4. Just doesn't seem like a good deal..
I guess these marketing guys are pretty smart, for me, the Tremor is the only maverick that holds any interest, don't care about mpg, just want a small interesting truck that has some degree of off road competence.To me the Tremor is the version that makes the least sense. Less utility, worse gas milage just for a little better off roading over the FX4. Just doesn't seem like a good deal..
It is significantly better off roading than the FX4.To me the Tremor is the version that makes the least sense. Less utility, worse gas milage just for a little better off roading over the FX4. Just doesn't seem like a good deal..
Yes Steven, $40k is good because $48k is the average price of a new vehicle. I posted a video yesterday that showed the Maverick loaded Lariat cost msrp at just $36.450. That is less than the cost of a lot of sedans.40k is a budget vehicle in todays market. I dont see the value in any vehicle in 23.