Sponsored

DIY intake and IAT testing

Dodeboost

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2022
Threads
6
Messages
223
Reaction score
320
Location
Southern California
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XL ecoboost AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I put this intake together using a AEM 2036DK dry filter with a filter wears pre filter, spectre 3” aluminum tube, and a mount with some 1/8 aluminum bar stock. It definitely feels more responsive, and the turbo sounds are great. However, the concern with something like this is that you’re sucking hot engine bay air, so I decided to take some temps comparing it to the stock box. I went on the same 14 mile drive 2 times, with a temp probe on the filter itself(shoved between the pre filter and filter element) as well as in the bottom of the stock air box. The drive consisted of a twisting windy road with lots of uphill and downhill without stopping, followed by about 3 miles of frequent stop lights. Both trips I stopped and idled in my driveway for 3 minutes at the end of the trip. Ambient temp was 60F for both tests.



New intake:

Cruising 30-50mph IAT hovered around 10-20 above ambient. At stop lights shot up to 30-35 above ambient within about a minute, but recovered quickly once moving again. Idling for 3 minutes saw temps at 60 degrees above ambient.



Stock box:

Cruising at 30-50mph IAT was around 8-15 above ambient. At stop lights rose to about 20 over ambient, although temps rose more slowly. Temps were slower to recover once moving again. Idling for 3 minutes saw temps at 40 degrees above ambient.



This is pretty much what I expected, although I thought the stock box would be a little better since it’s a true cold air intake. The stock box was definitely more consistent, and had lower temps overall. Still not sure if I’m going to leave my intake on, I imagine it will be pretty bad in the summer when it’s 90+ here. I may swap the straight tube for a 45 to get it further away from the engine and possibly try to make a heat shield. The only thing that worries me is stop and go traffic will see pretty high intake temps.

Ford Maverick DIY intake and IAT testing 6A1C972E-6421-4DBA-862B-48E7247F1C50


Ford Maverick DIY intake and IAT testing 9EB129D1-5782-4553-83F9-48C2FE3E0031


Ford Maverick DIY intake and IAT testing D4B26D3C-525D-413D-8A85-079F49E5191C
Sponsored

 

Deerslayer1980

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 14, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
187
Reaction score
222
Location
Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Get a plastic 45-degree piece made by spectre and get that filter farther out and towards the fender. IATs will be better than the stock box. I've tried about every setup, and this ended up the best. I'll take a pic after work.
 

Jwhisl

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
James
Joined
Dec 7, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
143
Reaction score
122
Location
Tulsa
Vehicle(s)
2014 f150
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
When I made my intake I used a cheap $30 kit from Amazon that gave me the 45* tube and a mount. The filter that came with the kit choked my engine and it was a noticeable power loss. I changed out the filter to a k&n and never looked back. I also left the elbow piece from the factory air box to deliver colder air to the filter .
 
OP
OP
Dodeboost

Dodeboost

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2022
Threads
6
Messages
223
Reaction score
320
Location
Southern California
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XL ecoboost AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
@Deerslayer1980 Sounds good. Any reason for plastic over aluminum? Does it transfer less heat? I’ll definitely switch this out for a 45
 
OP
OP
Dodeboost

Dodeboost

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2022
Threads
6
Messages
223
Reaction score
320
Location
Southern California
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XL ecoboost AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
When I made my intake I used a cheap $30 kit from Amazon that gave me the 45* tube and a mount. The filter that came with the kit choked my engine and it was a noticeable power loss. I changed out the filter to a k&n and never looked back. I also left the elbow piece from the factory air box to deliver colder air to the filter .
The elbow wouldn’t fit but once I get the 45 on there it should. Thanks
 

Sponsored

Deerslayer1980

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 14, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
187
Reaction score
222
Location
Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost

Automan21

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Mel
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
23
Messages
1,060
Reaction score
925
Location
CT
Vehicle(s)
‘23 XLT Eco AWD 4K Tow
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I put this intake together using a AEM 2036DK dry filter with a filter wears pre filter, spectre 3” aluminum tube, and a mount with some 1/8 aluminum bar stock. It definitely feels more responsive, and the turbo sounds are great. However, the concern with something like this is that you’re sucking hot engine bay air, so I decided to take some temps comparing it to the stock box. I went on the same 14 mile drive 2 times, with a temp probe on the filter itself(shoved between the pre filter and filter element) as well as in the bottom of the stock air box. The drive consisted of a twisting windy road with lots of uphill and downhill without stopping, followed by about 3 miles of frequent stop lights. Both trips I stopped and idled in my driveway for 3 minutes at the end of the trip. Ambient temp was 60F for both tests.



New intake:

Cruising 30-50mph IAT hovered around 10-20 above ambient. At stop lights shot up to 30-35 above ambient within about a minute, but recovered quickly once moving again. Idling for 3 minutes saw temps at 60 degrees above ambient.



Stock box:

Cruising at 30-50mph IAT was around 8-15 above ambient. At stop lights rose to about 20 over ambient, although temps rose more slowly. Temps were slower to recover once moving again. Idling for 3 minutes saw temps at 40 degrees above ambient.



This is pretty much what I expected, although I thought the stock box would be a little better since it’s a true cold air intake. The stock box was definitely more consistent, and had lower temps overall. Still not sure if I’m going to leave my intake on, I imagine it will be pretty bad in the summer when it’s 90+ here. I may swap the straight tube for a 45 to get it further away from the engine and possibly try to make a heat shield. The only thing that worries me is stop and go traffic will see pretty high intake temps.

6A1C972E-6421-4DBA-862B-48E7247F1C50.webp


9EB129D1-5782-4553-83F9-48C2FE3E0031.webp


D4B26D3C-525D-413D-8A85-079F49E5191C.webp
Nice work !! You should make these and sell them.
 

Tiger Dude

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Skip
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
793
Reaction score
1,212
Location
Louisiana USA
Vehicle(s)
2023 XL
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
My opinion is that 80% of "gains" from new intakes are because it's louder so it sounds faster. Recognize that if it did do something, it will only be at wide open throttle, otherwise the throttle is your pressure loss. These do nothing for fuel mileage.
 
OP
OP
Dodeboost

Dodeboost

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2022
Threads
6
Messages
223
Reaction score
320
Location
Southern California
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XL ecoboost AWD
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
My opinion is that 80% of "gains" from new intakes are because it's louder so it sounds faster. Recognize that if it did do something, it will only be at wide open throttle, otherwise the throttle is your pressure loss. These do nothing for fuel mileage.
Yeah I literally just want to hear the turbo, that’s the only reason I put this on.
Sponsored

 
 







Top