- Thread starter
- #196
I still disagree. Many including yourself is limiting million of vehicles to what or who you know. Similar to study or poll only using a select group rather than either a larger pool or different demographics. I will agree that any one having an issue with a manufacturer should diligently look into how many are reporting the same issue with NHSTA .Again I think it has more to do with the individual design etc. Maybe it's a GM thing but a guy I work with his GMC has maybe 50,000 miles on it and the transmission ate itself. Toyota uses them and I know a mechanic who inspects my older car and he drives a Prius and he says it's the most dependable vehicle he's come across and he recommends them to everybody. So I don't think again it is the technology that's like saying engines are unreliable because the pinto was a sled or the Vega used to shoot spark plugs out of the head or whatever it did
They are all having issues and recalls. I think Ford escalated this when they stopped manufacturing the parts and started outsourcing them. Only reason I say this the timeline coincides with this particular issue and I have a hard time thinking it's coincidence.
In a nutshell in the end they are not saving money or creating and maintaining a customer base with increased recalls and warranty issues. So in the end it's costing them so much more or a very costly error.
Sponsored