Acceleration difference Hybrid vs EcoBoost Turbo

[AngeloInSC]

If anybody sees any head to head comparisons, especially a 0-60 mph run, I would love to know about it. All I've seen is one with a "YouTube" guy and it was a 6.4 for the Turbo and 7.59 for the Hybrid. It wasn't a controlled test since he was just out on an open road with a handheld meter. I would like to see a C&R or MotorTrend test run. I really want the Mav to beat the Ranger my son just bought 2 months ago. Ha!

Sponsored

 

[pxpaulx]

If anybody sees any head to head comparisons, especially a 0-60 mph run, I would love to know about it. All I've seen is one with a "YouTube" guy and it was a 6.4 for the Turbo and 7.59 for the Hybrid. It wasn't a controlled test since he was just out on an open road with a handheld meter. I would like to see a C&R or MotorTrend test run. I really want the Mav to beat the Ranger my son just bought 2 months ago. Ha!

Ford Ranger Curb weight/HP (FX4) = 4441/270 = 16.44lb/HP
Maverick FX4 Curb/HP = 3674/250 = 14.7lb/HP

That translates to almost 10% lighter weight to power ratio for the Maverick.

 

[AngeloInSC]

Ford Ranger Curb weight/HP (FX4) = 4441/270 = 16.44lb/HP
Maverick FX4 Curb/HP = 3674/250 = 14.7lb/HP

That translates to almost 10% lighter weight to power ratio for the Maverick.

Yes, exactly. I did that calc and figured the Mav would come out on top, but that's not what many of the estimates have been showing. I don't see how they are coming up with them.

Sponsored