When Does Maverick Make Sense?

[anblatt]

Like every other buying decision, it comes down to the individual's needs/wants. For me the Lariat at $33,000 was a good value. I rode in a XLT and was really surprised at how much the sound deadening glass and active x seats made a difference in the Lariat. I also enjoy the B&O sound system in my Lariat. As much time as I spend on the highway (140-mile round trip each day) the Adaptive Cruise Control and Lane Centering made the Lariat a must. I went with the Maverick because compared to all the other hybrid pickups that get this kind of gas mileage.....oh wait, that's it. Granted I was only able to get it at 33k because I ordered in 23 and got rolled to 24, the same truck now would be over 36K and would not be as good a value to me. I went from a Nissan Kicks getting 30-32 on the highway to my Lariat Hybrid getting 35-37 on the highway. The Nissan was 25K new vs the 33K for the Maverick. The 8k for me was worth it for all of the above.

Sponsored

 

[710-oil-614]

The Maverick makes sense to the buyer who wants to purchase it at the price that they are happy buying it at.

Everything else is subjective.

 

[AlsMaverick]

I just did a quick build on a Ranger XLT and equipped it similar to my 2024 Lariat FX4 w/4K tow. The Ranger was $6k higher and still didn't have all the features of my Lariat and is bigger than I want. So, with that fact and my subjective viewpoint, that's when it makes sense.

 

[Bill Quattlebaum]

This is a question that could ponder upon many individuals due to the vast price range spanning +$23,000 to +$40,000. This is a very large window leaving the Maverick more and less compelling depending on price.

When does it make sense? I believe it has no competition under $30k. Especially when pairing with the hybrid. You’re going to get better or equal mpg compared to gas savors like Honda civic. You get practicality of a truck bed. Makes little projects simple to load materials for. And you get king resale values of a truck. And the interior is tastefully designed considering budget friendly price. To me, nothing competes under $30k. Keep in mind, we are talking about brand new rather than used market for vehicles.

When does the Maverick begin to become less compelling. It begins so at $30k-$35k. The vehicles in this range have luxury like interiors available. Big improvements for tech and speakers. In general, creature comforts begin to become more vastly available and even standard. I believe the maverick in this price is still desirable though. But in a different way that requires the details. For example, still great mpg and very easy to park and maneuver due to size. Truck bed is still nice for suburban home owner use. Still not a lot of truck options in the price zone if this is what someone wants. Sure, now you can get a mid size truck, but you’re not getting it 4x4 under $35k. Still okay options available. But competition and expectations are defenately heating up. This price range also opens the door to a decent size crossovers like the Kia Sorrento.

I believe the Maverick loses most of its compelling appeal at $35k and up. I can see why many would still choose it though. But there are a lot of draw backs. At this price, you’re still getting a very plastic interior. Parts are not fitted great to begin with but its ignorable at the lower prices. I no longer think thats acceptable at this price. Leather seats are not impressive. Seats are very narrow even for smaller individuals. And no nice stitching work on the seat. Now you could consider an SUV. Or you can easily get a mid size truck with 4x4. Ultimately, in my opinion, when starting to consider a fully loaded model for any vehicle, its best to move to the next model up at base trim. High trims have higher percentage of deprecation than the lower trims. And ultimately, the vehicle was built on an affordable platform. I cant see paying near or over $40k for a vehicle that starts out at $23k. I cant see it. Especially when there is still soo much plastic. Yes I said it again. The high trim levels is where the automotive manufacture makes the most money. And for good reason, they are not worth what they are marked up. I am most often under whelmed by these loaded out models in general. Most do not have an appearance or feel to match their price.

I will end with this. The Ford Maverick is a fantastic vehicle at the end of the day. But the perspective of how great it is, deeply depends on the price tag. My perspective of the vehicle changes with the price. It’s a bargain or steal at some prices and possibly a questionable choice at others. Ultimately, the maverick seems as if it will have a cult following same as the tacoma does. Thanks for reading.

That $23,000 does not exist anymore. The base XL is now $25,410, and that is for the Ecoboost. Add $1,500 for the hybrid. I agree that the Maverick is a better value at $31,000 or less. I like my 2024 XL, but understand that many people want more options that I don't.

 

[F50]

Like every other buying decision, it comes down to the individual's needs/wants. For me the Lariat at $33,000 was a good value. I rode in a XLT and was really surprised at how much the sound deadening glass and active x seats made a difference in the Lariat. I also enjoy the B&O sound system in my Lariat. As much time as I spend on the highway (140-mile round trip each day) the Adaptive Cruise Control and Lane Centering made the Lariat a must. I went with the Maverick because compared to all the other hybrid pickups that get this kind of gas mileage.....oh wait, that's it. Granted I was only able to get it at 33k because I ordered in 23 and got rolled to 24, the same truck now would be over 36K and would not be as good a value to me. I went from a Nissan Kicks getting 30-32 on the highway to my Lariat Hybrid getting 35-37 on the highway. The Nissan was 25K new vs the 33K for the Maverick. The 8k for me was worth it for all of the above.

I am always so surprised with how many people actually like adaptive cruise control. I do a lot of highway driving. And honestly I think its about as irritating as cheesy dual climate control. If i set my speed to 70. I want to go 70. I dont want to descretly slow down to 65 because of the vehicle infront of me. And sometimes not realize that it decreased my speed. Then once I realize, I have to then speed up, pass, and reset the cruise control. Not a fan. But from what I have been reading on here, a lot of people seem to love it.

 

[tciotti2003]

So coming from an "old fart" who bought his 1st new truck...A 1977 shortbed 4 wheel drive Chevy 1/2 ton with jackman lights, reddish maroon, with the white push guard and roll bar and wheels, I'm totally loving my new to me but used 2022 1st edition lariat...And if I can be frank, I'm having no issues at all with the plastic interior, door handles and such. MY 8 speaker sound system sounds great, my "little beast" looks so nice, drives awesome, and with the 2,0 ecoboost has some real get up and go to it. Purchased mine right at the 30k mark and it had 20k miles on it. And honestly, I don't get paying thousands of dollars more for dressed up aesthetics. And here's the real about trucks...How many trucks do you all see going down the road that are basically grocery getters and ubers for the kids? Not being used at all for it's intended purposes...And then I come here to this forum and see all the proud owners, bitchen modifications being done, and the amount of information being shared and I have to say, makes me even more proud to be a part of this. So, for me, I don't have any problem with the price points of the Ford Maverick....Just for me!

 

[mshapeer]

This is a question that could ponder upon many individuals due to the vast price range spanning +$23,000 to +$40,000. This is a very large window leaving the Maverick more and less compelling depending on price.

When does it make sense? I believe it has no competition under $30k. Especially when pairing with the hybrid. You’re going to get better or equal mpg compared to gas savors like Honda civic. You get practicality of a truck bed. Makes little projects simple to load materials for. And you get king resale values of a truck. And the interior is tastefully designed considering budget friendly price. To me, nothing competes under $30k. Keep in mind, we are talking about brand new rather than used market for vehicles.

When does the Maverick begin to become less compelling. It begins so at $30k-$35k. The vehicles in this range have luxury like interiors available. Big improvements for tech and speakers. In general, creature comforts begin to become more vastly available and even standard. I believe the maverick in this price is still desirable though. But in a different way that requires the details. For example, still great mpg and very easy to park and maneuver due to size. Truck bed is still nice for suburban home owner use. Still not a lot of truck options in the price zone if this is what someone wants. Sure, now you can get a mid size truck, but you’re not getting it 4x4 under $35k. Still okay options available. But competition and expectations are defenately heating up. This price range also opens the door to a decent size crossovers like the Kia Sorrento.

I believe the Maverick loses most of its compelling appeal at $35k and up. I can see why many would still choose it though. But there are a lot of draw backs. At this price, you’re still getting a very plastic interior. Parts are not fitted great to begin with but its ignorable at the lower prices. I no longer think thats acceptable at this price. Leather seats are not impressive. Seats are very narrow even for smaller individuals. And no nice stitching work on the seat. Now you could consider an SUV. Or you can easily get a mid size truck with 4x4. Ultimately, in my opinion, when starting to consider a fully loaded model for any vehicle, its best to move to the next model up at base trim. High trims have higher percentage of deprecation than the lower trims. And ultimately, the vehicle was built on an affordable platform. I cant see paying near or over $40k for a vehicle that starts out at $23k. I cant see it. Especially when there is still soo much plastic. Yes I said it again. The high trim levels is where the automotive manufacture makes the most money. And for good reason, they are not worth what they are marked up. I am most often under whelmed by these loaded out models in general. Most do not have an appearance or feel to match their price.

I will end with this. The Ford Maverick is a fantastic vehicle at the end of the day. But the perspective of how great it is, deeply depends on the price tag. My perspective of the vehicle changes with the price. It’s a bargain or steal at some prices and possibly a questionable choice at others. Ultimately, the maverick seems as if it will have a cult following same as the tacoma does. Thanks for reading.

I wanted a compact truck to replace my 97 GMC Sonoma SLS. The GMC Canyon (Sonoma successor) was too expensive (and larger than needed). My 2024 XL hybrid was just under $30,000 out the door. And that included the copilot360, hitch receiver, and bed mat. I did not see anything else that offered that much for that price.

 

[NedF]

The first car I bought new was an 81 Nissan (by Datsun) Sentra. The door panels were vinyl covered pressboard with roll up windows. The tech was an AM/FM radio with cassette player... It is the bar I now use to rate an entry level vehicle. My Maverick is only my 3rd vehicle since then. I don't count the Subaru Crosstrek I drove for 3 years as it was a company car and I garaged my Saturn and drove it on the weekends. I opted for the Lariat as this is the first time I have had any of the driver assists (other than basic cruse control). The Maverick is actually my first vehicle with Bluetooth. I am 60+ and in all of my driving years I had never paid more than 35K CAD for a vehicle. My Lariat was 46K CAD MSRP (inc. BAP, mats and flaps), but I could not be happier with it.

 

[F50]

So coming from an "old fart" who bought his 1st new truck...A 1977 shortbed 4 wheel drive Chevy 1/2 ton with jackman lights, reddish maroon, with the white push guard and roll bar and wheels, I'm totally loving my new to me but used 2022 1st edition lariat...And if I can be frank, I'm having no issues at all with the plastic interior, door handles and such. MY 8 speaker sound system sounds great, my "little beast" looks so nice, drives awesome, and with the 2,0 ecoboost has some real get up and go to it. Purchased mine right at the 30k mark and it had 20k miles on it. And honestly, I don't get paying thousands of dollars more for dressed up aesthetics. And here's the real about trucks...How many trucks do you all see going down the road that are basically grocery getters and ubers for the kids? Not being used at all for it's intended purposes...And then I come here to this forum and see all the proud owners, bitchen modifications being done, and the amount of information being shared and I have to say, makes me even more proud to be a part of this. So, for me, I don't have any problem with the price points of the Ford Maverick....Just for me!

Well said. This forum does make me think this will be a cult following vehicle. A lot of people are highly satisfied. Its really a great looking mini truck that has been built around real needs. Your exactly right, most people who drive those costly trucks never will use them.

 

[Oscarcat]

This is a question that could ponder upon many individuals due to the vast price range spanning +$23,000 to +$40,000. This is a very large window leaving the Maverick more and less compelling depending on price.

When does it make sense? I believe it has no competition under $30k. Especially when pairing with the hybrid. You’re going to get better or equal mpg compared to gas savors like Honda civic. You get practicality of a truck bed. Makes little projects simple to load materials for. And you get king resale values of a truck. And the interior is tastefully designed considering budget friendly price. To me, nothing competes under $30k. Keep in mind, we are talking about brand new rather than used market for vehicles.

When does the Maverick begin to become less compelling. It begins so at $30k-$35k. The vehicles in this range have luxury like interiors available. Big improvements for tech and speakers. In general, creature comforts begin to become more vastly available and even standard. I believe the maverick in this price is still desirable though. But in a different way that requires the details. For example, still great mpg and very easy to park and maneuver due to size. Truck bed is still nice for suburban home owner use. Still not a lot of truck options in the price zone if this is what someone wants. Sure, now you can get a mid size truck, but you’re not getting it 4x4 under $35k. Still okay options available. But competition and expectations are defenately heating up. This price range also opens the door to a decent size crossovers like the Kia Sorrento.

I believe the Maverick loses most of its compelling appeal at $35k and up. I can see why many would still choose it though. But there are a lot of draw backs. At this price, you’re still getting a very plastic interior. Parts are not fitted great to begin with but its ignorable at the lower prices. I no longer think thats acceptable at this price. Leather seats are not impressive. Seats are very narrow even for smaller individuals. And no nice stitching work on the seat. Now you could consider an SUV. Or you can easily get a mid size truck with 4x4. Ultimately, in my opinion, when starting to consider a fully loaded model for any vehicle, its best to move to the next model up at base trim. High trims have higher percentage of deprecation than the lower trims. And ultimately, the vehicle was built on an affordable platform. I cant see paying near or over $40k for a vehicle that starts out at $23k. I cant see it. Especially when there is still soo much plastic. Yes I said it again. The high trim levels is where the automotive manufacture makes the most money. And for good reason, they are not worth what they are marked up. I am most often under whelmed by these loaded out models in general. Most do not have an appearance or feel to match their price.

I will end with this. The Ford Maverick is a fantastic vehicle at the end of the day. But the perspective of how great it is, deeply depends on the price tag. My perspective of the vehicle changes with the price. It’s a bargain or steal at some prices and possibly a questionable choice at others. Ultimately, the maverick seems as if it will have a cult following same as the tacoma does. Thanks for reading.

For me, my Mav is a combination of the 19th century Swiss Army Knife [invented in 1897] and a 21st century Smart Phone.

To elaborate, I only need a truck with an open bed part of the time. I don't tow and I don't go off-road routinely. When I do, they are improved dirt roads. The rest of the time I could do with an SUV to carry tools etc. that has a nice ride and creature comforts for trips.

With those needs in mind, I sold my 2016 GMC Canyon that had a 74" bed and could tow 7000lbs but the bed was so high it was hard to reach stuff and the ride was that of a truck, which it was. I don't regret it.

I find my '24 hybrid Lariat with a sunroof checks all the boxes for me. With price protection it cost about $35k before taxes. I even like the two-tone interior as I was tired of monotone dark interiors. Not to mention a range of over 600 miles on a single tank.

Therefore, even though I agree that the dollar value proposition may be in a different trim, I am willing to pay extra for the features that make my Mav feel more like driving an SUV. FoMoCo is not new at this and know there are people like me willing to spring for a vehicle that costs $10k above a base trim.

 

[tciotti2003]

For me, my Mav is a combination of the 19th century Swiss Army Knife [invented in 1897] and a 21st century Smart Phone.

To elaborate, I only need a truck with an open bed part of the time. I don't tow and I don't go off-road routinely. When I do, they are improved dirt roads. The rest of the time I could do with an SUV to carry tools etc. that has a nice ride and creature comforts for trips.

With those needs in mind, I sold my 2016 GMC Canyon that had a 74" bed and could tow 7000lbs but the bed was so high it was hard to reach stuff and the ride was that of a truck, which it was. I don't regret it.

I find my hybrid Lariat with a sunroof checks all the boxes for me. With price protection it cost about $35k before taxes. I even like the two-tone interior as I was tired of monotone dark interiors. Not to mention a range of over 600 miles on a single tank.

Therefore, even though I agree that the dollar value proposition my be in a different trim, I am willing to pay extra for the features that make my Mav feel more like driving an SUV. FoMoCo is not new at this and knows there were people like me willing to spring for a vehicle that costs $10k above a base trim.

Well said, my friend! Couldn't agree more!

 

[anblatt]

I am always so surprised with how many people actually like adaptive cruise control. I do a lot of highway driving. And honestly I think its about as irritating as cheesy dual climate control. If i set my speed to 70. I want to go 70. I dont want to descretly slow down to 65 because of the vehicle infront of me. And sometimes not realize that it decreased my speed. Then once I realize, I have to then speed up, pass, and reset the cruise control. Not a fan. But from what I have been reading on here, a lot of people seem to love it.

Thats the thing you don't have to reset it. Just pass when you get a chance and its already set. It is the biggest help when there's lots of traffic. The dual climate is a marriage saver if you have a spouse having hot flashes by the way .

 

[Carlitos_92]

I am always so surprised with how many people actually like adaptive cruise control. I do a lot of highway driving. And honestly I think its about as irritating as cheesy dual climate control. If i set my speed to 70. I want to go 70. I dont want to descretly slow down to 65 because of the vehicle infront of me. And sometimes not realize that it decreased my speed. Then once I realize, I have to then speed up, pass, and reset the cruise control. Not a fan. But from what I have been reading on here, a lot of people seem to love it.

Exactly. I tell people that I drive like a commercial airline pilot: I want to get to my cruising speed and altitude as expediently as possible, and I want to stay there. For any given speed limit, I already know exactly how fast I want to go (usually no more than 10% over the limit). I even use cruise even in 30mph zones, mostly to keep myself out of trouble.

One of the things that ACC seems to do is "somewhat" mitigate the existence of oblivious fools around us who will vary their speed +/- 15mph on the freeway because they don't use regular cruise control AND are either inattentive, inconsiderate, or maybe just having a spasm in their right leg...

My main beef with ACC is, like you say, that it doesn't solve the issue that I already know how fast I want to go. Personally I would rather change lanes and/or pass to maintain my desired speed as opposed to varying my speed at the whim of everyone else. That presumes those avoidance options are there, and I know they often aren't, especially in urban settings. I don't actively avoid buying vehicles with ACC, but that is at least my objection to using it. If I tried it out I might end up liking it, who knows...

 

[F50]

Exactly. I tell people that I drive like a commercial airline pilot: I want to get to my cruising speed and altitude as expediently as possible, and I want to stay there. For any given speed limit, I already know exactly how fast I want to go (usually no more than 10% over the limit). I even use cruise even in 30mph zones, mostly to keep myself out of trouble.

One of the things that ACC seems to do is "somewhat" mitigate the existence of oblivious fools around us who will vary their speed +/- 15mph on the freeway because they don't use regular cruise control AND are either inattentive, inconsiderate, or maybe just having a spasm in their right leg...

My main beef with ACC is, like you say, that it doesn't solve the issue that I already know how fast I want to go. Personally I would rather change lanes and/or pass to maintain my desired speed as opposed to varying my speed at the whim of everyone else. That presumes those avoidance options are there, and I know they often aren't, especially in urban settings. I don't actively avoid buying vehicles with ACC, but that is at least my objection to using it. If I tried it out I might end up liking it, who knows...

I wont buy a vehicle that has it unless it has an easy way to shut it off. For me its a deal breaker feature. I drive to much on the highway to like it.

For me, my Mav is a combination of the 19th century Swiss Army Knife [invented in 1897] and a 21st century Smart Phone.

To elaborate, I only need a truck with an open bed part of the time. I don't tow and I don't go off-road routinely. When I do, they are improved dirt roads. The rest of the time I could do with an SUV to carry tools etc. that has a nice ride and creature comforts for trips.

With those needs in mind, I sold my 2016 GMC Canyon that had a 74" bed and could tow 7000lbs but the bed was so high it was hard to reach stuff and the ride was that of a truck, which it was. I don't regret it.

I find my '24 hybrid Lariat with a sunroof checks all the boxes for me. With price protection it cost about $35k before taxes. I even like the two-tone interior as I was tired of monotone dark interiors. Not to mention a range of over 600 miles on a single tank.

Therefore, even though I agree that the dollar value proposition may be in a different trim, I am willing to pay extra for the features that make my Mav feel more like driving an SUV. FoMoCo is not new at this and know there are people like me willing to spring for a vehicle that costs $10k above a base trim.

I understand. Pretty nice tank range. Im seeing about 540. But i drive half the time on highway.

 

[Sonjaab]

Howdy All!
I am a longtime GM truck owner and have had several new 2500 with snowplow. Now have a 03 s-10 x cab 4x4 with 200k miles. Been lookin at new GM 1500 4x4 $50k! So a new base awd Maverick is $29k. Gonna take my 2 trades 13 Impala and 84 Corvette to dealer and "play the game". Prob. gonna offer wholesale anyway. (old truck sold). Need a new truck and shrink my 6 car fleet.! No dealer add ons, mop n glo pkg. just MSRP. tax. SUCKS no more Ford stockholder discount.

Sponsored