- First Name
- Dave
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2024
- Threads
- 16
- Messages
- 836
- Reaction score
- 1,056
- Location
- Fruitland Idaho
- Vehicle(s)
- 2023 XLT Hybrid pushing a 40 foot diesel motorhome 2014 Toyota 4Runner Limited
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
The way I read this from California, is they originally wanted a physical device that would limit a vehicle to a max of 10 miles per hour over the posted limit. They settled on a warning device instead because Newsome indicated he did not want the original bill (with a restrictive actual device) passed in an election year as some would be weaponized as a political tool. (wow, he got one right). So looks like you guys are going to get a "warning device" My take (old guy here) is you most likely, after the election of course, get an actual mechanical/electronic device that may limit your vehicle to no more than the ten over speed limit. We used to call action like this the old "slippery slope". Good luck.I get the need to get people to slow down and when conventional methods are ignored, it can be an open invitation to big brother politics.
There's a city here in Southern California that is experimenting with cameras that are triggered if a vehicle is operating 10mph or more over the speed limit. I think that is a much better alternative to built-in speed reduction.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/24/california-car-speed-limit-00154155
Sponsored