- Joined
- Oct 23, 2021
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 177
- Reaction score
- 87
- Location
- North Iowa
- Vehicle(s)
- 95 Dodge Dakota 5.2L, 96 Geo Prizm 1.8L
- Engine
- 2.5L Hybrid
- Thread starter
- #1
I was going to get some CrossClimate 2's yesterday then I saw the WeatherReady 2's on display side by side with the CC2. I decided to investigate them. Discount Tire (other places as well) has them $15 cheaper than the CC2, $80 off set of 4 if you buy them before tomorrow, and $100 manufacture rebate. That right there is a $260 saving after tax over CC2 if I get all the discounts and rebates.
Goodyear says they perform better then CC2. Then there is Discount tires data. WR2 shows they are not EV rated, higher roller resistant (1.5) vs CC2 (4.5), more noise (3) vs CC2 (3.5), worse stopping distance in almost all conditions. WR2 (Dry 129, Wet New 153 and Old 196, Winter Rating 5) Vs CC2 (Dry 125, Wet New 145 and Old 164, Winter Rating 4.5.
So, looking at the data going on with WR2 it shows better performance than stock and a little worse than CC2. Save money over CC2 but lose MPG over the CC2 and Stock. It looks fuel cost vs tire cost could be a wash or more if the rolling resistance is that bad. The data could be flawed since it is new.
The rubber did fell softer on the WR2 over the CC2. The Discount Tire data did say they did test it at 60 MPH on Dry Roads. Did no say wet weather was used just showed data on it . Snow weather no testing. Then next to the data it shows CC2 comparison. I find is hard to believe wet stopping is that bad to the CC2.
Either way got 9 hours to make up my mind.
I am replacing the stock ProContacts at 41k. They started to wear down badly at 20k. At 30k handling for wet weather was bad. We have not had much wet weather this year so with winter coming needed to change them out.
Anyone have experience with them being out only a few months?
Goodyear says they perform better then CC2. Then there is Discount tires data. WR2 shows they are not EV rated, higher roller resistant (1.5) vs CC2 (4.5), more noise (3) vs CC2 (3.5), worse stopping distance in almost all conditions. WR2 (Dry 129, Wet New 153 and Old 196, Winter Rating 5) Vs CC2 (Dry 125, Wet New 145 and Old 164, Winter Rating 4.5.
So, looking at the data going on with WR2 it shows better performance than stock and a little worse than CC2. Save money over CC2 but lose MPG over the CC2 and Stock. It looks fuel cost vs tire cost could be a wash or more if the rolling resistance is that bad. The data could be flawed since it is new.
The rubber did fell softer on the WR2 over the CC2. The Discount Tire data did say they did test it at 60 MPH on Dry Roads. Did no say wet weather was used just showed data on it . Snow weather no testing. Then next to the data it shows CC2 comparison. I find is hard to believe wet stopping is that bad to the CC2.
Either way got 9 hours to make up my mind.
I am replacing the stock ProContacts at 41k. They started to wear down badly at 20k. At 30k handling for wet weather was bad. We have not had much wet weather this year so with winter coming needed to change them out.
Anyone have experience with them being out only a few months?
Sponsored