Sponsored

My non-scientific analysis of a Maverick 2.0 EcoBoost vs Altitude

MankDeems

2.0L EcoBoost
Banned
Banned
First Name
Zac
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
117
Reaction score
161
Location
Fargo ND
Vehicle(s)
99 ranger 4X4 XLT, 04 Mazda6, 17 ninja300
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #1
I live in northern Denver Colorado altitude of 5,348. I drove back home to North Dakota altitude of 900ft and MAN does my truck have NUTS

I can report both 87 octane runs, sport drive mode, 6.3 vs 7.3sec One full second faster to 60 MPH in Fargo! I had posted previous about my run at bandimere where my stock 4k tow (lowest diff ratio) mav ran a pathetic 16.5 @ 82, wish I had time while I was in town to get more data at the quarter mile but I was surprised at the difference immediately.

fair to say as a rule of thumb we can cut 1 second off our 0-60 per 4000ft?

Ford Maverick My non-scientific analysis of a Maverick 2.0 EcoBoost vs Altitude IMG20230731220949 (1)
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

dalola

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Retired
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
2,539
Reaction score
4,351
Location
SE Ohio 🇺🇸
Website
sunsetridgecabinhockinghills.com
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mustang Mach-E P4X, '24 Bronco Big Bend 2Dr Sasquatch, Hot Rods
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
lol....try your test again in a non-FI vehicle. 🤠
 
 







Top