Sponsored

Autoblog LOBO review

Blue_Max

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jul 31, 2024
Threads
11
Messages
1,625
Reaction score
4,003
Location
Orlando, FL
Vehicle(s)
2024 Maverick XLT AWD, 2001 Crown Victoria Police Interceptor, 1995 Mustang GTS
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Thanks for sharing a written review!

The guy didn't cover the whole reason for the Lobo, though: its improved handling. It makes me lament the death of print magazines, though. Even 10 years ago, Ford would have had a fleet of Lobos at a road course like Laguna Seca or something, and reviewers would have made instrumented test runs, and they would have compared those numbers to the numbers of a standard Maverick and whatever is considered its competition.

All the Lobo reviews I've seen merely cover the difference in looks and "feel" of the vehicle.
 
OP
OP
Bdesign

Bdesign

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Steve
Joined
May 31, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
227
Reaction score
359
Location
Santa cruz, CA
Vehicle(s)
2025 Lobo MPC EB
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I bought the Lobo because of the look and feel and the price (402A). It needs "real tires" and the torque-vector aspect of the rear dif needs to be available in the normal and sport modes. It should be a normal part of the truck, not only part of a "track-mode". It's a stated feature that really is not available normally. Like having AC that only works if it is 100 degrees outside.
Sponsored

 
 







Top