Search results

Agreed except the maverick is the spiritual successor to the fusion.

If you want to do real truck things, you need a real truck. I don’t want a real truck, I want a practical commuter hence maverick

It’s not a real truck. If you want a real truck, spend the money and get a real truck. Seems simple.

Sigh. that’s my point. If ford could get 26/17 from using a different cai they would so they could brag about the figures in a brochure. Putting a cai or a k/n filter on a stock vehicle is like tuning on 87 octane. Futile and a waste of time and money.

It’s almost as if a multi billion dollar company doesn’t test their powertrains for the best power to economy with longevity in mind before they bring a product to market. 🤔

Someone should mail that to Farley so he can put that talk he does to use and not send that dealer another maverick, ever

Towing capacity 8900 pounds?

I like the Santa Cruz better, but I only like the limited at 41k. Maverick only wins because it’s almost 15k cheaper in the configuration I like.

Point is, any aftermarket tune on 87 is ragged edge in my opinion. There are higher octane fuels for a reason. Still waiting for proof otherwise.

Other manufacturers sell small cars profitably. Have you ever looked at Civic or Corolla sales? When it comes to small cars, the fact is ford built crap. The transmission issues alone were enough to kill them. And their first answer was the ecosport 😂 ok. If the maverick is troublesome, all of...

I feel like if you are looking at a 2.0 or hybrid small suv there are better choices over an escape.

Agreed. 1.5 is a worthless engine. The 2.5 naturally aspirated Mazda that ford put in the escape/fusion until 2019 is the waaaaaay better choice. Better engine by far with same hp rating.

VSS vehicle speed sensor needs to show the vehicle isn’t moving for it to go into park. someone needs to run theirs out of gas running 70 on the expressway to see if it goes into neutral though!

First off, I’m not talking about trans tuning which sure can make a difference. i was commenting on tuning a 2.0 for 87 octane. Like I said, makes no sense to me and I would like to see the proof. Tuning something on the ragged edge using 87 seems counterproductive.

Ford’s proprietary “market basket formula”

We can disagree here. I’d have to see the results to become a believer. 87 octane and tune shouldn’t be used in the same sentence imo.

Are you square shaped? 🤔

might be some flexibility with expiration, but when they expire from non use you don’t lose the allotment, you can just get a new pin.

Pin only good for 6 months, and if you use plan you are supposed to keep for 6 months before selling, or risk losing future plans.

I mean what do you expect ford to do? And yes, you should maybe take a look at your life and be happier. Don’t stress over the little things like a car order.