Search results

No. I removed the trim panels at the doors and popped the bin halves out. Under the bin and behind the rear seat was one of the first areas I did. It made a noticeable difference. The bin is essentially a drum. I used the aluminum butyl first the covered it with 4mm deadening foam. I also put...

I removed the front seats, the door sill, foot well panels and the rear storage bin. I lifted the carpet towards the center console and held it up with a piece of 2×3.

I was wondering what the screen was for. Never crossed my mind that it was a resonator.

I have added aluminum buty sound deadener to nearly every panel of my Maverick. I have coverd the inside of the fenders, top half of the tailgate, in the doors, under the rear seat, under the carpet, the roof and the back wall. I added 4mm foam deadener to back side of the door panels. I also...

Is the X-Type too loud?

I agree, it should be color matched. What exhaust system did you install?

I have done inside the doors, fenders, under the the carpet and rear seat storage bin, and the roof with the aluminum butyl sound deadener. I also added deadening foam to the backside of the door panels, under the storage bin, the roof and the back of the cab. The difference is way better than I...

The water passes through easily and the filter element dries quickly.

They look interesting. I wonder if the Tamarack needles.

I found a Maple seed caught in the rocker. There is a company that manufacturers a grill to prevent debris from draining into the rockers. My issue with the grill is the size of the holes. The Tamarack trees shed tiny needles that would easily pass through the holes in the grill. My solution is...

Do you know if it is 250 on 87 octane?

That is correct for the 2024 and earlier 2.0 EB. On 87 octane they make 231 hp. The new for 2025 2.0 EB makes 238 on 87 octane. I haven't seen figures for the new engine with 91 octane.

The 390 was not available in 1977. 77 was the year they dropped the 360 & 390 for the 351/400M's. The F100 was discontinued when the Ranger came along.

Not only did they offer color options they also had choices as to where the second color was applied.

It's hard to believe there is only a 2kg (4.4lbs) difference in weight between the two trucks. The Maverick benefits from 48 years of advancements in technology. For example the 2.0L Ecoboost makes 238 hp whereas the 5.8L (351 cu/in) made 161 hp. The modern brake with ABS are better. A base...

10.5:1 compression hydraulic roller cam. I had it on the dyno last summer, but It had too much cylinder pressure because the cam was too small. It made 541Hp and 650lbft.

Very cool!! Do you have an idea of what it makes for power? The intake is an Edelbrock performer rpm .

68 Mustang's are one of the nicest looking Mustangs. My F100 engine is a stroked 460 (520). The cam is fairly mild. I hope it will make 600 hp and maybe 650 lbft. That is sweet!!

The rotors (disks) are 20mm bigger on the Maverick.

The Focus and Maverick have the same hole spacing but the Maverick studs are 2mm larger.