Part number of rubber center console pads/mats ?

[Milous]

...Any link to the schematic ?

#7 is the large mat
#8 I believe is the smaller mat
#9 is the FLAT mat that goes inside the console on the bottom ($57.00 for tiny thin flat mat!!!!!!)

Sponsored

 

[Nw_adventure]

#7 is the large mat
#8 I believe is the smaller mat
#9 is the FLAT mat that goes inside the console on the bottom ($57.00 for tiny thin flat mat!!!!!!)

Oh my goodness # 9 is a piece of felt ! Does the schematic list the corresponding PN#s ?

 

[Milous]

Oh my goodness # 9 is a piece of felt ! Does the schematic list the corresponding PN#s ?

https://www.oempartsforyourford.com...5882344__10803988/Center-console/MM22470.html

 

[Nw_adventure]

https://www.oempartsforyourford.com...5882344__10803988/Center-console/MM22470.html

Thx - different dealer / OEM Ford website. Lists the abbreviation of the longer PN - kind of a mess without a color notation -

https://parts.ford.com/shop/en/us/body/other-trim-parts/mat-14222679-1

 

[bbhaag]

So not to get side tracked but why are there two different part numbers for the same product?

Why are the part numbers on the back of my liners not coming up on Fords parts website but @Milous are?

 

[Nw_adventure]

So not to get side tracked but why are there two different part numbers for the same product?

Why are the part numbers on the back of my liners not coming up on Fords parts website but @Milous are?

The links he has provided are from a different website and not https://parts.ford.com/en.html- Spent a couple hours of nonsense on this today- Very inconsistent and PN naming nomenclature- So on the Parts/Ford site they list the same PN for the three trims none of which mention color and or are specific to which trim they belong to other than mentioning "Less Wireless" Great just tell me which one is Orange baby !

 

[Milous]

So not to get side tracked but why are there two different part numbers for the same product?

Not sure yet, sometimes is just a change of suppliers, or some sort of unknown revision.

Why are the part numbers on the back of my liners not coming up on Fords parts website but @Milous are?

The part numbers stamped on trim pieces (as well as on other parts) are some sort of internal reference. Ford assigns a totally different part #. I truly don't understand why they don't or can't just use one part number!

The Ford parts numbering system is beyond confusing, and very non-descriptive. Images are often wrong, details missing, different parts with very similar but different numbers.

The Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep system is so much more intuitive. You can enter a vehicle VIN and parts will be perfectly filtered. Their system is also much better at denoting different trim/parts colors. In addition, their parts will end, for example, with a 2 letter suffix - like "AA". When the part is changed or updated it advances to "AB", "AC", "AD" etc. When ordering a part one knows that "AD" is a newer, and the latest revision.

Ford, on the other hand, will have suffixes like "AA", "AB", "BA" of which they are totally different parts. And Ford also uses dashes or no dashes for the same part # (example: NZ6Z60045G34BA and NZ6Z-60045G34-BA). And then sometimes they will just shorten it to "60045G34BA".

I would guess that Ford gets a ton of returned parts because of their ass-backwards antiquated numbering system. I would hate to work in one of their parts departments.

Ford definitely needs to hire more qualified people - not only for their parts systems, but for those writing the service and owner's manuals - what a mess of confusion and errors those are plagued with, don't get me started lol.

 

[Nw_adventure]

Not sure yet, sometimes is just a change of suppliers, or some sort of unknown revision.


The part numbers stamped on trim pieces (as well as on other parts) are some sort of internal reference. Ford assigns a totally different part #. I truly don't understand why they don't or can't just use one part number!

The Ford parts numbering system is beyond confusing, and very non-descriptive. Images are often wrong, details missing, different parts with very similar but different numbers.

The Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep system is so much more intuitive. You can enter a vehicle VIN and parts will be perfectly filtered. Their system is also much better at denoting different trim/parts colors. In addition, their parts will end, for example, with a 2 letter suffix - like "AA". When the part is changed or updated it advances to "AB", "AC", "AD" etc. When ordering a part one knows that "AD" is a newer, and the latest revision.

Ford, on the other hand, will have suffixes like "AA", "AB", "BA" of which they are totally different parts. And Ford also uses dashes or no dashes for the same part # (example: NZ6Z60045G34BA and NZ6Z-60045G34-BA). And then sometimes they will just shorten it to "60045G34BA".

I would guess that Ford gets a ton of returned parts because of their ass-backwards antiquated numbering system. I would hate to work in one of their parts departments.

Ford definitely needs to hire more qualified people - not only for their parts systems, but for those writing the service and owner's manuals - what a mess of confusion and errors those are plagued with, don't get me started lol.

Finding simple OEM parts should not require this amount of difficulty and guessing - Yowsa

Sponsored