Sponsored

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 Vs. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

jesemd

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2022
Threads
11
Messages
262
Reaction score
391
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Forester
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Nokian. Because its more fun to say Hakkapeliitta than Blizzak.
Sponsored

 

rjag2034

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Jun 30, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
72
Reaction score
81
Location
Victoria BC
Vehicle(s)
Porsche, Lexus
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Had R5's for 2 winters on this Mav and they were great in the snow and ice.Awesome tire but so are the Blizzaks. You cant go wrong either way
Ford Maverick Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 Vs. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 20220929_161949055_iOS
Ford Maverick Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 Vs. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 20220929_010630546_iOS
Ford Maverick Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 Vs. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 20220929_162000208_iOS
 

Optimus

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
372
Reaction score
465
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
2023 XLT Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
How long did you have the Hakkapeliitta's? I was wrong in my original post and the price difference is larger then I thought it would be. The difference will be about $300 installed. With that being said, I think I can get about 3 winters from the Bridgestones until the special compound wears off. If I can get 5 years from the Hakkapeliitta's I still may go with those.
With our ā€˜23 Mav, 1 winter so far. On a previous vehicle, 2 winters. At a $300 price difference, I’d personally go for the Blizzaks. Both are excellent tires and I think you’ll be happy either way. Snow tires typically don’t have mileage warranties, as they are super soft rubber and will indeed wear faster. But it is this trait that also gives them superior traction over regular rubber.

I’ve had to change my line of thinking regarding snow tires over the years. Rather than being a tool to help ā€œget somewhere,ā€ I’m more interested in them now in terms of avoiding an accident whether it’s avoiding injuries, damage to the only brand new vehicle I’ve ever owned, potentially paying a claim deductible and higher insurance premiums, or to simply wanting to avoid the downtime if a vehicle has to get repaired. Covid was not kind to the auto industry, and autobody and availability of parts are no exception. Add to that, our Mavs appear to be easily totaled if rear-ended.
 
OP
OP

Andrew.802

2.5L Hybrid
Active member
First Name
Andrew
Joined
Jun 24, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
35
Reaction score
8
Location
Vermont
Vehicle(s)
2025 Lariat Hybrid AWD
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
With our ā€˜23 Mav, 1 winter so far. On a previous vehicle, 2 winters. At a $300 price difference, I’d personally go for the Blizzaks. Both are excellent tires and I think you’ll be happy either way. Snow tires typically don’t have mileage warranties, as they are super soft rubber and will indeed wear faster. But it is this trait that also gives them superior traction over regular rubber.

I’ve had to change my line of thinking regarding snow tires over the years. Rather than being a tool to help ā€œget somewhere,ā€ I’m more interested in them now in terms of avoiding an accident whether it’s avoiding injuries, damage to the only brand new vehicle I’ve ever owned, potentially paying a claim deductible and higher insurance premiums, or to simply wanting to avoid the downtime if a vehicle has to get repaired. Covid was not kind to the auto industry, and autobody and availability of parts are no exception. Add to that, our Mavs appear to be easily totaled if rear-ended.
Good to hear. I actually ended up working out a really amazing deal for some Hakkapeliitta's. ~$750 shipped to my door. The only extra cost I will incur is the install (it's free with the Bridgestones at Costco).
Sponsored

 
 







Top