Must not be forgettable, you still remember it. Others do too.
Maverick on the other hand after it fades into just becoming another boring choice among others just might be the forgettable one.
These dealers making more profit on a sale than ford is š. Wake up Ceo, put your money where your mouth is and stop sending any more units for the year to dealers who do this.
Why let a dealer make more profit than you while creating non ford loyalists at the same time.
It would be fine to 2k without worry. My point being a small landscape trailer and an suv can be just as much ātruckā as the base maverick anyway for that rare situation.
Paying 10k more than you have to, then financing it appears to be the ultimate flex. Donāt argue with angry people, they will just bring you down to their level.
Itās new and itās cheap. In about three years when the new wears off and the price trends upward they wonāt be as in demand and will fade into the landscape along with the sea of other offerings.
When a vehicle is all new there is always an initial rush for people to want them which usually...
By your figures in this thread, you paid 15% over. In the Other thread you posted additional fees that were over 5% more, so his math seems to be spot on
Maverick makes the ranger a niche vehicle now. Small, cheap, functional, practical vehicle in the maverick or a real truck with the f150. What other than increased towing capacity does the ranger offer over maverick? Smaller cabin? Might as well get an f150 over ranger at that point. Mileage...
The way I see it, more than 10k profit for the dealer. Around 7k mark up/fees then at least 3k profit built in (other dealers are selling 3k off msrp and they arenāt talking a loss).
The dealers are likely making more profit than the actual manufacturers which have risk as opposed to the dealer...