Search results

Thanks, that is what I thought. Only 9K so it is on their dime.

I have read the owners manual and you can turn off the lane centering at any time, including when using adaptive cruise. I stated in my post that I use adaptive all the time without the lane centering. THe issue just happened today that I cannot turn it off.

I use adaptive cruise control a lot. Today, the lane centering icon came on when I turned on the cruise control. Thought that was weird and attempted to turn it off via the button on the turn signal. No luck. And no where in the manual do they address this. When not in cruise, I can turn...

Well, being in Minnesota, magnesieum (sp) chloride is the product used. It sticks and doesn't wash off. I am 76. I am now going south in the winters. Not sure how long I will keep it up. My Lincoln TC has never been exposed to salt. It has no rust at all. It is a 2005. So, I am thinking...

Any one done it? If so, what product?

Ditto on more info and/or pics of the left rear issues.

Anyone having a problem with the multitude of small chips? Had to replace mine already. Small chip turned into a 20 inch crack. Now the replacement, an OEM, is experiencing small chips. Do we have soft glass? I have heard we have lighter weight glass to save weight.

Yup. Mud, tar, stone chips, so I think they will stay.

Not sure I like the look. Opinions???

jfg6869: Facts are stuborn things.

Probably not much difference, but some. I will be fun to test. We will see. I do know it takes 28% more alcohol to product the same energy as gas. That is if you use straight alcohol. The biggest result is 34.6 mpg. Way more than the EPA estimate.

I tried 91, no ethanol. I ran a tank to rid the tank of 87. Used 91 as stated. Went on a 869 mile trip at speeds of 55, 60 and 70. Some city driving and other starting and stopping. The mileage indicator in the vehicle showed 36.5 mpg. The actual calculated was 34.6. So it was off by 1.9...

Yup, 245/55/18. Someone has a listing of new take-offs, in that size, for $125. Seems too good to be true.

Anyone have experience with these tires?

You will notice better mileage with non-alcohol fuel. I tested 87 E10 vs straight 87, in my 2001 Ranger several years ago. I tested 5 consecutive fills to ensure all E10, was purged from the tank. My last tank I averaged 20.2 versus 19.4 all highway miles. No real benefit since it was $0.40...

Thanks

Looking at several different ones. Could use some help deciding on brand. What did you buy and why?

Already got a big ding as I noted in another post. I bought the 3.8 cm but have not put them on as yet. Waiting for warmer weather.

Can the speedometer be adjusted to indicate the correct speed with larger diameter tires?

Leaning towards the Mabett flairs. Hope they are in stock soon.