- Thread starter
- #1
Saw this the other day while making my deliveries at work. Don't know the actual size but it's definitely smaller than a Mav!
Sponsored
Those are getting popular. Guy in my neighborhood just got one and my coworker has been wanting one for awhile.
Saw this the other day while making my deliveries at work. Don't know the actual size but it's definitely smaller than a Mav!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_Carry
Saw this the other day while making my deliveries at work. Don't know the actual size but it's definitely smaller than a Mav!
Dimensions Wheelbase 2,205 mm (86.8 in) Length 4,195 mm (165.2 in) (pickup truck)
4,237–4,344 mm (166.8–171.0 in) (cargo/utility van)Width 1,675–1,765 mm (65.9–69.5 in) Height 1,870–1,910 mm (73.6–75.2 in) (pickup truck)
2,030–2,167 mm (79.9–85.3 in) (cargo/utility van)Curb weight 1,065–1,100 kg (2,347.9–2,425.1 lb)
The 2nd car I ever drove was a 1950's era (1953 IIRC) VW van (Combi, as it was called in Brazil). Originally had a whopping 36 HP, but ours had well over 400,000 km on it, and had been "rebuilt" numerous times. We had to drive up a fairly steep mountain road on a regular basis. If all five of us were in it, my brother and I would have to get out and push to get it up the steepest hills. On one occasion, when we were carrying some heavy furniture, we had to put it in reverse (lowest gear ratio) and back up the hill. We still had to push, though. Fun times! (But I don't want to repeat them at 66 - and counting.)When I went to college in the 2000s the university had a fleet of kei trucks like that (mostly Cushmans, which were rebranded Mitsubishi Minicabs I think). The college has a steep ass hill, and friends I knew who worked maintenance said they had to effectively get a running start to make it up the thing