Sponsored

R-E-L-A-X

2.0L EcoBoost
Member
First Name
Mike D
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Threads
3
Messages
10
Reaction score
19
Location
Green Bay WI
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Lifted-1.jpg


TLDR: A 2-Inch Lift and Oversizes All-Terrain Tires will Cost You Roughly 2 mpg vs. Stock. Read on for full details...

OK, since I installed 2-inch Eibach lift springs and Firestone Destination AT 245/70/17 tires on my 2022 XLT FX4 4K Tow, lots of folks have asked about real-world fuel economy. However, I needed to wait until I had a chance to do some significant highway driving in order to calculate it accurately. This week, I'm on a college tour with my 11th-grade son. So, I've had the chance to do long stretches of Interstate on relatively flat ground at various speeds. What follows is an in-depth explanation of my findings, starting with a VERY IMPORTANT note.

NOTE: Due to the oversized tires, both the speedometer and odometer on the truck are not accurate. The speedo reads roughly 2 mph slow at highway speeds, while I measured the odometer reading roughly 18.8-18.9 miles traveled over 20 miles of measured mile on the Interstate. This measurement is EXTREMELY important when calculating fuel economy, since there is a 5.5-6% discrepancy between how far I've actually driven and how far the truck thinks I've driven. In other words, fuel economy displayed by the on-board computer is going to be 5.5-6% lower than actual fuel economy (and that's assuming all else is properly calibrated).

Anyway, with that important explanation given, here's what I've come up with.

LEGAL HIGHWAY SPEED: 28.5 mpg actual
With my cruise control set at 60 mph, the truck computer gives me a fuel economy of 27 mpg. Factoring in the discrepancy for the speedometer and odometer, this results in actual fuel economy of roughly 28.5 mpg at 62 mph.

SPEEDING HIGHWAY SPEED: 23 mpg actual
I typically cruise at 75 mph on trips such as this, and one thing I noticed is that you really give us A LOT of fuel economy as your speed increases from 60 to 70 mph. RPMs on my engine go from about 1,500 to 2,000 during that 10 mph increase, and displayed fuel economy drops from 27 mpg to less than 21 mpg. Factoring in the odometer discrepancy, and also using my manual calculations from 300+ miles of driving, I come up with an actual fuel economy at these speeds of roughly 23 mpg.

So, the bottom line is this: If you drive very conservatively (I added Eco mode to my FX4 with Forscan and used it during this testing) at highway speeds, it appears you can approach the EPA rated 29 mpg highway even with a lift kit and oversized tires. However, mileage drops off considerably as you increase speed between 60 and 70 mph, and you'll likely give up 5-7 mpg over just a 10 mph speed difference. My guess is this is where the lessened aerodynamics of the lifted truck and wider road contact patch of the tires really start to take a toll.

Interestingly, it's worth noting that from 70-80 mph, I did not see nearly as much of a dropoff in fuel economy as I did between 60 and 70 mph. So, perhaps the moral of the story is if you're going to speed, don't sweat it over a few extra mph! LOL

Hope that proves helpful/informative to others who may have lifted trucks or considering doing so. Personally, I'd say the loss is well worth it for my personal taste in aesthetics and plans to use the truck for hunting, camping, etc. Still a heck of a lot better than V8 Escalade I was driving before the Maverick, and a heck of a lot better looking too!

Firestone-3.jpg
Great write up and analysis. Matches up perfectly with my experience as well.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
pa-outdoorsman

pa-outdoorsman

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Threads
116
Messages
2,155
Reaction score
4,523
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XLT, EB, LUX, FX4, 4K, Cactus Gray
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
In my earlier post I said 26-27 at 70-75 seemed normal for me with my bed racks and box but then I’m on a road trip yesterday and avg speed is 70+ but mostly going 75 and I average over 29 mpg and that includes going up and over a huge pass. Go figure.

8421BF53-6D21-4FE7-A8D0-C7B6FD8E5933.jpeg
Is your truck with the 4K Tow package?
 

Big Kahuna

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
696
Reaction score
1,265
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Is your truck with the 4K Tow package?
Yup 4K FX4. Getting 29+ this road trip even with my racks and box. I got 30 once on a trip before I added the racks and box but most of the time I average 27-28 on the freeway but this trip was open road and long stretches with very little speed changes.

Ford Maverick ⛽️ Real-world MPG Stats for Maverick FX4 4K TOW Lifted w/ 2" inch Eibach Springs and 245/70/17 AT Tires B67032CD-E3DE-4265-9680-BA87235BB95C
 
OP
OP
pa-outdoorsman

pa-outdoorsman

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Threads
116
Messages
2,155
Reaction score
4,523
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XLT, EB, LUX, FX4, 4K, Cactus Gray
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Yup 4K FX4. Getting 29+ this road trip even with my racks and box. I got 30 once on a trip before I added the racks and box but most of the time I average 27-28 on the freeway but this trip was open road and long stretches with very little speed changes.

B67032CD-E3DE-4265-9680-BA87235BB95C.jpeg
Well IDK how you're doing it but congratulations!
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
pa-outdoorsman

pa-outdoorsman

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Threads
116
Messages
2,155
Reaction score
4,523
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XLT, EB, LUX, FX4, 4K, Cactus Gray
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I should mention using 92 or 93 octane gas
Ah, I haven't put premium in my tank yet. Around here the price difference is $1/gallon. That's $15 per fill up. Hard to justify even for an extra 60 miles per tank it's more expensive.
 

Mark S.

2.0L EcoBoost
Active member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Dec 10, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
32
Reaction score
28
Location
St. Jacob, IL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Bronco Sport
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Yup 4K FX4. Getting 29+ this road trip even with my racks and box. I got 30 once on a trip before I added the racks and box but most of the time I average 27-28 on the freeway but this trip was open road and long stretches with very little speed changes.

B67032CD-E3DE-4265-9680-BA87235BB95C.jpeg
Higher altitude means lower air density, which means less wind resistance. It's the same reason airliners can go faster at higher altitudes; less drag.
 

Mark S.

2.0L EcoBoost
Active member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Dec 10, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
32
Reaction score
28
Location
St. Jacob, IL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Bronco Sport
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
NOTE: Due to the oversized tires, both the speedometer and odometer on the truck are not accurate. The speedo reads roughly 2 mph slow at highway speeds, while I measured the odometer reading roughly 18.8-18.9 miles traveled over 20 miles of measured mile on the Interstate. This measurement is EXTREMELY important when calculating fuel economy, since there is a 5.5-6% discrepancy between how far I've actually driven and how far the truck thinks I've driven. In other words, fuel economy displayed by the on-board computer is going to be 5.5-6% lower than actual fuel economy (and that's assuming all else is properly calibrated).
Did you take any hand measurements, or are all your calculations based on estimates?
 
OP
OP
pa-outdoorsman

pa-outdoorsman

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Threads
116
Messages
2,155
Reaction score
4,523
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XLT, EB, LUX, FX4, 4K, Cactus Gray
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Did you take any hand measurements, or are all your calculations based on estimates?
What do you mean "hand measurements?" I used actual amount of fuel put into tank. Actually used the measured mile markers on the Interstate to compare odometer to actual distance.
 

reddead

2.0L EcoBoost
New member
First Name
Brett
Joined
Apr 1, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
3
Reaction score
10
Location
Oconto County, WI
Vehicle(s)
Kia Seltos (Ford Maverick Ordered)
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Great thread, this is good info. I have a question about the lift and larger tires. Do you have Copilot 360? If so, do you see any negative effects with it and the larger tires/lift?
 
Sponsored
OP
OP
pa-outdoorsman

pa-outdoorsman

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Threads
116
Messages
2,155
Reaction score
4,523
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick XLT, EB, LUX, FX4, 4K, Cactus Gray
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Great thread, this is good info. I have a question about the lift and larger tires. Do you have Copilot 360? If so, do you see any negative effects with it and the larger tires/lift?
Don't have CP360. Sorry.
 

Mark S.

2.0L EcoBoost
Active member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Dec 10, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
32
Reaction score
28
Location
St. Jacob, IL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Bronco Sport
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
What do you mean "hand measurements?" I used actual amount of fuel put into tank. Actually used the measured mile markers on the Interstate to compare odometer to actual distance.
In the post I commented on you said: "With my cruise control set at 60 mph, the truck computer gives me a fuel economy of 27 mpg. Factoring in the discrepancy for the speedometer and odometer, this results in actual fuel economy of roughly 28.5 mpg at 62 mph."

I'm asking if your fuel economy computations included actual measurement of fuel used vs miles traveled, not by applying a correction factor to the computer displayed mileage.
Sponsored

 
 




Top