Sponsored

GSTRIDR

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Aug 28, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
46
Reaction score
36
Location
Alabama
Vehicle(s)
4Runner Trail
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Can some of the new Tremor owners comment on their real world fuel economy for us? Highway mpg is more important for me, and I’m trying to determine if I need to change back to an FX4 4k tow. Wasn’t expecting to see that 24 mpg estimate on the Tremor from Ford. Thanks!
Sponsored

 

brnpttmn

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
1,938
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
"Real world" MPGs isn't really a thing. MPGs are going to vary based on many variables. If you're interested in the comp between the EB AWD and Tremor the EPA estimates are going to be the best comparison as they are the only standardized tests. Here's a table to help compare the two based on various scenarios:
City %Hwy %EB AWDTremor% diffMPG diff$/yr (@15K $4)$/yr (@10K $3.50)5 yr est
100​
0​
22​
20​
-9%​
-2​
$ (273)$ (159)$ (1,080)
90​
10​
22.7​
20.4​
-10%​
-2.3​
$ (298)$ (174)$ (1,180)
80​
20​
23.4​
20.8​
-11%​
-2.6​
$ (321)$ (187)$ (1,269)
70​
30​
24.1​
21.2​
-12%​
-2.9​
$ (341)$ (199)$ (1,348)
60​
40​
24.8​
21.6​
-13%​
-3.2​
$ (358)$ (209)$ (1,419)
55​
45​
25.2​
21.80​
-13%​
-3.35​
$ (367)$ (214)$ (1,451)
50​
50​
25.5​
22​
-14%​
-3.5​
$ (374)$ (218)$ (1,482)
40​
60​
26.2​
22.4​
-15%​
-3.8​
$ (388)$ (227)$ (1,538)
30​
70​
26.9​
22.8​
-15%​
-4.1​
$ (401)$ (234)$ (1,588)
20​
80​
27.6​
23.2​
-16%​
-4.4​
$ (412)$ (241)$ (1,632)
10​
90​
28.3​
23.6​
-17%​
-4.7​
$ (422)$ (246)$ (1,671)
0​
100​
29​
24​
-17%​
-5​
$ (431)$ (251)$ (1,706)
 
OP
OP
GSTRIDR

GSTRIDR

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Aug 28, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
46
Reaction score
36
Location
Alabama
Vehicle(s)
4Runner Trail
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
"Real world" MPGs isn't really a thing. MPGs are going to vary based on many variables. If you're interested in the comp between the EB AWD and Tremor the EPA estimates are going to be the best comparison as they are the only standardized tests. Here's a table to help compare the two based on various scenarios:
City %Hwy %EB AWDTremor% diffMPG diff$/yr (@15K $4)$/yr (@10K $3.50)5 yr est
100​
0​
22​
20​
-9%​
-2​
$ (273)$ (159)$ (1,080)
90​
10​
22.7​
20.4​
-10%​
-2.3​
$ (298)$ (174)$ (1,180)
80​
20​
23.4​
20.8​
-11%​
-2.6​
$ (321)$ (187)$ (1,269)
70​
30​
24.1​
21.2​
-12%​
-2.9​
$ (341)$ (199)$ (1,348)
60​
40​
24.8​
21.6​
-13%​
-3.2​
$ (358)$ (209)$ (1,419)
55​
45​
25.2​
21.80​
-13%​
-3.35​
$ (367)$ (214)$ (1,451)
50​
50​
25.5​
22​
-14%​
-3.5​
$ (374)$ (218)$ (1,482)
40​
60​
26.2​
22.4​
-15%​
-3.8​
$ (388)$ (227)$ (1,538)
30​
70​
26.9​
22.8​
-15%​
-4.1​
$ (401)$ (234)$ (1,588)
20​
80​
27.6​
23.2​
-16%​
-4.4​
$ (412)$ (241)$ (1,632)
10​
90​
28.3​
23.6​
-17%​
-4.7​
$ (422)$ (246)$ (1,671)
0​
100​
29​
24​
-17%​
-5​
$ (431)$ (251)$ (1,706)
I understand your position, and appreciate the comparison, but I’d like to hear what owners are experiencing with their new trucks.
 

brnpttmn

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
1,938
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I understand your position, and appreciate the comparison, but I’d like to hear what owners are experiencing with their new trucks.
K. but you're going to be waiting for a while before a critical mass of them gets to members and they have the chance to put significant miles on them. Not to mention it's winter now and the cold weather, dense air, and winter blends are going to impact this "empirical analysis." Come back in 6 months to a year and you'll have a decent group of users who've broken in their trucks and actually have enough miles to make a decent estimate. Still, most will have completely different driving habits than you, will have made other modifications, will be filling up with different octanes, etc. Further, half of those will be citing the dashboard numbers (rather than multi-tank averages) introducing more error. In the end, you can probably take all of the inputs you get, average them, and they'll probably come out within a couple MPGs of the EPA estimates.

On the other hand, you'll likely get a few early optimistic posters getting 20-30% over the rated mileage in time to make your decision, and you'll have some nice confirmation bias to tell you want you really want to hear...buy the tremor. :)
 

MAVRICKDAVE

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Nov 12, 2022
Threads
53
Messages
287
Reaction score
223
Location
ohio
Vehicle(s)
23 XLT Oxford White Tremor 24 XL Atlas Blue Hybrid
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
I just want my Tremor TAP, :(
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
GSTRIDR

GSTRIDR

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Aug 28, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
46
Reaction score
36
Location
Alabama
Vehicle(s)
4Runner Trail
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
K. but you're going to be waiting for a while before a critical mass of them gets to members and they have the chance to put significant miles on them. Not to mention it's winter now and the cold weather, dense air, and winter blends are going to impact this "empirical analysis." Come back in 6 months to a year and you'll have a decent group of users who've broken in their trucks and actually have enough miles to make a decent estimate. Still, most will have completely different driving habits than you, will have made other modifications, will be filling up with different octanes, etc. Further, half of those will be citing the dashboard numbers (rather than multi-tank averages) introducing more error. In the end, you can probably take all of the inputs you get, average them, and they'll probably come out within a couple MPGs of the EPA estimates.

On the other hand, you'll likely get a few early optimistic posters getting 20-30% over the rated mileage in time to make your decision, and you'll have some nice confirmation bias to tell you want you really want to hear...buy the tremor. :)
I’m aware it’s early and anecdotal information, but if people are eking out 22 mpg or less on the highway, I’d rather know now and make a more informed decision.
 

NoVaJimmy

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
1,482
Reaction score
2,273
Location
NoVa
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lexus GX 460
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
K. but you're going to be waiting for a while before a critical mass of them gets to members and they have the chance to put significant miles on them. Not to mention it's winter now and the cold weather, dense air, and winter blends are going to impact this "empirical analysis." Come back in 6 months to a year and you'll have a decent group of users who've broken in their trucks and actually have enough miles to make a decent estimate. Still, most will have completely different driving habits than you, will have made other modifications, will be filling up with different octanes, etc. Further, half of those will be citing the dashboard numbers (rather than multi-tank averages) introducing more error. In the end, you can probably take all of the inputs you get, average them, and they'll probably come out within a couple MPGs of the EPA estimates.

On the other hand, you'll likely get a few early optimistic posters getting 20-30% over the rated mileage in time to make your decision, and you'll have some nice confirmation bias to tell you want you really want to hear...buy the tremor. :)
You're posting here with theoretical info when OP is pretty clearly asking for real world experience. I have theorized that Tremor owners will see much better highway mileage figures considering I am running tires heavier than the Wildpeaks on my AWD Maverick and I routinely get 35+ mpg on the highway. This is my most recent trip to see family and I have seen better mileage than 35.2 average on the same trip in the summer:

Ford Maverick Real world Maverick Tremor MPG -- What's yours? MPG


The Tremor EPA figures are estimates and I have a hard time believing that anything on the Tremor is going to drastically change highway MPG figures considering that although it probably has a heavier curb weight than my XL by at least 100 pounds, the tires are lighter and rotational mass can easily add the equivalent of significantly more static weight. The tremor has the same body style, gearing and so on.
 

MavFromTheDead

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Derek
Joined
Nov 19, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
201
Reaction score
194
Location
Leander, Texas
Vehicle(s)
XLT Tremor
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
You're posting here with theoretical info when OP is pretty clearly asking for real world experience. I have theorized that Tremor owners will see much better highway mileage figures considering I am running tires heavier than the Wildpeaks on my AWD Maverick and I routinely get 35+ mpg on the highway. This is my most recent trip to see family and I have seen better mileage than 35.2 average on the same trip in the summer:

MPG.jpg


The Tremor EPA figures are estimates and I have a hard time believing that anything on the Tremor is going to drastically change highway MPG figures considering that although it probably has a heavier curb weight than my XL by at least 100 pounds, the tires are lighter and rotational mass can easily add the equivalent of significantly more static weight. The tremor has the same body style, gearing and so on.
Are you sure the gearing is the same? Does the different AWD system make a difference? Is there more of a parasitic drag with beefier half shafts and the clutch diffs in the back? I seriously doubt that that Ford would screw itself and rate the MPG's lower if that wasn't the case. I'd love for that to be the case, because I'm not crazy about the new numbers either, but...
 

brnpttmn

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
1,938
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
You're posting here with theoretical info when OP is pretty clearly asking for real world experience. I have theorized that Tremor owners will see much better highway mileage figures considering I am running tires heavier than the Wildpeaks on my AWD Maverick and I routinely get 35+ mpg on the highway. This is my most recent trip to see family and I have seen better mileage than 35.2 average on the same trip in the summer:
Not to be pedantic, but I posted controlled and standardized empirical data, and you responded with your own hypothesis.
 

NoVaJimmy

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
1,482
Reaction score
2,273
Location
NoVa
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lexus GX 460
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Not to be pedantic, but I posted controlled and standardized empirical data, and you responded with your own hypothesis.
You posted data based on EPA estimates, is that really data after all or is it just an analysis of.......estimates? Also, OP asked for real world results. I posted a photo of real world results which can be authenticated by analyzing the data in my photo. Someone here already posted about their experience with their Tremor and it was more along the lines of what I see in my AWD Ecoboost non Tremor.
 
Sponsored
OP
OP
GSTRIDR

GSTRIDR

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Aug 28, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
46
Reaction score
36
Location
Alabama
Vehicle(s)
4Runner Trail
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
You're posting here with theoretical info when OP is pretty clearly asking for real world experience. I have theorized that Tremor owners will see much better highway mileage figures considering I am running tires heavier than the Wildpeaks on my AWD Maverick and I routinely get 35+ mpg on the highway. This is my most recent trip to see family and I have seen better mileage than 35.2 average on the same trip in the summer:

MPG.jpg


The Tremor EPA figures are estimates and I have a hard time believing that anything on the Tremor is going to drastically change highway MPG figures considering that although it probably has a heavier curb weight than my XL by at least 100 pounds, the tires are lighter and rotational mass can easily add the equivalent of significantly more static weight. The tremor has the same body style, gearing and so on.
Seems like there would also be opport
Not to be pedantic, but I posted controlled and standardized empirical data, and you responded with your own hypothesis.
All good, I like to hear multiple points of view. Maybe we’ll catch the eye of a lucky Tremor owner sooner or later, though! 🤞
 

NoVaJimmy

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
1,482
Reaction score
2,273
Location
NoVa
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lexus GX 460
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Are you sure the gearing is the same? Does the different AWD system make a difference? Is there more of a parasitic drag with beefier half shafts and the clutch diffs in the back? I seriously doubt that that Ford would screw itself and rate the MPG's lower if that wasn't the case. I'd love for that to be the case, because I'm not crazy about the new numbers either, but...
Gearing is exactly the same as my 4K tow and the RDU operates exactly the same, it just has an added clutch pack for locking both rear wheels.
 

MavFromTheDead

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Derek
Joined
Nov 19, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
201
Reaction score
194
Location
Leander, Texas
Vehicle(s)
XLT Tremor
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Clubs
 
Seems like there would also be opport

All good, I like to hear multiple points of view. Maybe we’ll catch the eye of a lucky Tremor owner sooner or later, though! 🤞
The guys from TexasTruck youtube gave their real world MPG's during their test.
 

brnpttmn

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
1,938
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
You posted data based on EPA estimates, is that really data after all or is it just an analysis of.......estimates? Also, OP asked for real world results. I posted a photo of real world results which can be authenticated by analyzing the data in my photo. Someone here already posted about their experience with their Tremor and it was more along the lines of what I see in my AWD Ecoboost non Tremor.
EPA estimates are based on five controlled and standardized fuel consumption tests. OP asked for real world tremor results even if you hypothesize there's no difference, the actual data suggests otherwise.
 

NoVaJimmy

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
1,482
Reaction score
2,273
Location
NoVa
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lexus GX 460
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
EPA estimates are based on five controlled and standardized fuel consumption tests. OP asked for real world tremor results even if you hypothesize there's no difference, the actual data suggests otherwise.
I fully understand how EPA ratings work, to the point that I also understand that the EPA doesn't actually test the vast majority of new vehicles (Only about 15% are actually tested by the EPA). Manufacturers test them and the EPA takes their word and sometimes winds up testing a specific vehicle and can and will challenge the manufacturer. Also, most manufacturers test pre-production units for EPA ratings and who knows why or how Ford came up with the Tremor estimates especially if it was a pre-production unit.
Sponsored

 
 




Top