Dude you don't have to keep posting the same misinformed blog post. Looking for actual information. The escape was recalled (different recall) for the crankshaft. From what I can tell the Maverick doesn't have the same issue.
Sponsored
Last edited:
Dude you don't have to keep posting the same misinformed blog post. Looking for actual information. The escape was recalled (different recall) for the crankshaft. From what I can tell the Maverick doesn't have the same issue.
[QUOTE="FinnsterBuilt week of 7-4, shipping presently. No recall for my vin on Ford.com, NHSTA, or Ford Pass app.. Was there a change/Mod to those built before/after the recall dates?
I would say, based on the bulletin dates, trucks built June 9 and after have the fix in place from the factory.Built week of 7-4, shipping presently. No recall for my vin on Ford.com, NHSTA, or Ford Pass app.. Was there a change/Mod to those built before/after the recall dates?
..I am still curious to know what's causing the engine failures leading to this. How do we know if we have the possibility of a part that can lead to a failure?
It’s February 2021 so it impacts all hybrids built before June 9 of this year.If some were built before the beginning Feb recall date and some built after the June 8th cutoff date, what happened in between?
It’s February 2021 so it impacts all hybrids built before June 9 of this year.
If Ford knows of a problem with the hybrid engines grenading, they ought to be approaching it from that angle. C'mon Ford, fix the root problem.Good question. Check yours when you get it. It probably has more holes in the splash guard. I am still curious to know what's causing the engine failures leading to this. How do we know if we have the possibility of a part that can lead to a failure?
No apologies needed. I think it is very easy to overlook since that was before anyone could even order one!. Apologies-almost a year since order. Note to self-close mouth, engage brain.
It's like 16 pages of my life I can't get back.. I feel you. A lot of people have a somewhat limited grasp on reality.I'm definitely dumber for having read through this entire thread.
From the recall notice in post #1 in this thread.Is there any evidence or acknowledgement that the engines are failing at a higher rate than normal? I've not seen any, and don't read this recall as being the result of more frequent engine failure.
Notice it's 'isolated' (as in they understand the scope of the manufacturing issues) and 'have resulted' is past tense. This coming only a few months after the Escape Hybrid was recalled for, you guessed it, an isolated batch of improperly manufactured cranks which caused engine failures and fires.I think they listed the manufacturing issues as a reason for the recall because they are causing higher than normal engine failure rates. Otherwise, why mention them at all? Why not just say "In the event of an engine failure breaching the block or oil pan... etc."?
I believe FORD knows the engines with the bad cranks and are sorting it out before they send the August 08 letter.From the recall notice in post #1 in this thread.
![]()
I think they listed the manufacturing issues as a reason for the recall because they are causing higher than normal engine failure rates. Otherwise, why mention them at all? Why not just say "In the event of an engine failure breaching the block or oil pan... etc."?
If I understand correctly, you think Ford issued this recall (admitting these issues are causing engine failures), but we have no reason to believe engine failures are more frequent than normal. That doesn't seem likely to me.
I'm not sure I get your point about Ford using the "past tense" to describe the failures it is aware of. Do you think Ford means similar failures will not occur in the future? If that's the case, why mention those manufacturing issues in this recall notice? Why not just say "In the event of an engine block or oil pan failure..."?Notice it's 'isolated' (as in they understand the scope of the manufacturing issues) and 'have resulted' is past tense.
I hope that's correct and that they intend to do something about the manufacturing issue, whatever it actually turns out to be. (I have the 2.5L engine, but I view this notice as only slightly increasing the chances of my vehicle having an engine failure. It doesn't seem like a big deal.)I believe FORD knows the engines with the bad cranks and are sorting it out before they send the August 08 letter.