- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
- Threads
- 85
- Messages
- 2,589
- Reaction score
- 2,221
- Location
- Salt Lake city
- Vehicle(s)
- Honda Element/ Toyota Highlander
- Engine
- 2.0L EcoBoost
On a side note the AWD S/C can't hang with the Maverick off-road...
Sponsored
The ESP plan is more inclusive, transferable and can be cancelled - The 2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz has a five-year/60,000-mile limited warranty and a 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty.Probably a little more expensive than that.
From the website linked by numike it looks like it is $1850 for 8 years/100,000k warranty with zero deductible (as far as I know if you buy this you arent buying another 8 years after the 3 years that come with it from the factory, you are really only buying another 5 years past the standard 3 year). That is still 2 years shy of the Hyundai if that matters at all.
But yeah, like I said earlier, for anyone that is trying to compare them in terms of price and whatnot, one could factor in the extra 1500-2000 extended warranty. Maverick or Santa Cruz, I plan on keeping it for that long, if not longer, so when comparing them I personally factor this price difference in, because I would definitely be buying it on the Mav. But thats just me. I know many on here have expressed that in their minds it is a waste of money.
This isn’t worth but $50.00. When you buy a new Ford you get Ford Pass points that will cover two “the works” service intervals. That will be at 10K, and 20K miles. At my dealership this costs $43.00 and it includes everything Hyundai is offering.I thought of another pro, if you are someone like me that is interested in the non-turbo, and are comparing it to the ecoboost. You wont have to do the walnut blasting that many around here talk about being needed on turbo engines.
Another pro is that Hyundai is currently offering 3 years of complimentary maintenance on new vehicle purchases. From what they say, that includes Oil Changes, Tire Rotations, Oil Filter Replacements, Multi-Point Inspections
For the record the build of my Maverick is solid and rugged! Doesn’t feel cheap at all!This posting is for those of you on the forum who, like me, are still not quite sure about the Maverick (and like me, you might have one on order). But maybe you haven't looked at the Santa Cruz in person because you don't like the styling or think it's too expensive.
This is NOT intended as some kind of antagonistic posting to troll Maverick owners. Folks, I have a Maverick on order and a Ford Ranger in my driveway. I'm a lifelong Ford truck guy (well, I'm wavering).
I placed my order 3 Sep of last year. I ordered a Maverick because I preferred the conventional styling, the slightly longer bed, and the really powerful Ecoboost engine with a conventional automatic. I like my little luxuries, so the bottom line for the XLT ECO 360 LUX SIBL, including delivery, is $30,500. But I've been kind of wincing at how cheap Ford went on everything. I've seen the truck in person, and it definitely does not impress. And the postings here just reinforce that constantly.
- EDIT BY OP - I was wrong in the next para. The equivalent build SC is $400 more than my Maverick build, not $2,000 cheaper.
So I decided that darn it, I was gonna go check out the competition. I went to look at a similarly equipped Santa Cruz SEL that costs about $2,000 LESS than the Maverick I have on order. Long story short, it impressed.
Bottom line is that I walked away seriously impressed with the lower trim Santa Cruz SEL. I have no build date for my constrained Maverick order and I need a Hobbit Truck sooner than later. And I walked away from the in-person review thinking "I can save $2,000 and get the same functionality sooner and with a ten year warranty". On the other hand, I'm thinking "Or I could stick with the Maverick and have all that horsepower and no piano black (but cheap hard plastics)". I'm thinking it over.
- The Santa Cruz is way more appealing in person than in pictures. I liked it a lot. It has presence. A neighbor has one and loves it. It looks good going down the street.
- I was impressed by little things, like a composite bed and sound insulation under the hood. And a waterproof storage compartment in the bed.
- Closing the doors, hood, or tailgate on the Maverick vs the Santa Cruz just screams "CHEAP". I'm not being a troll here, the quality difference just jumped out at me in a big way. I don't necessarily hate cheap. My crude 2010 Ranger is cheap, and I've loved that cheap hunk of junk for 102,000 safe and reliable miles.
- The CP360 safety features I want, like blind spot, etc - they're all standard on the Santa Cruz.
- All the rotary shift haters will roll their eyes, but I wish the Santa Cruz didn't have a conventional shift lever. It looks like an antique.
- The interior just blew the Maverick out of the water. Except for the stupid piano black. I mean there was no comparison - these vehicles are not in the same league. The higher quality of the rear view camera really stood out. The software just blows the Ford out of the water.
- The bed had higher sides and was a half foot shorter. I don't care about the length, but I prefer the Maverick sides. Easier for a boomer to reach into the bed.
- The paint quality really impressed. Again, quality of materials jumped out at me everywhere I looked.
- I loved the little foot step indents in the bumper
- Same bed cubbies and lighting as the Maverick
- A bit smaller in the rear seat. Which is a non-issue for me as I really want a two door trucket in the first place.
- Mileage wasn't all that different from the Eco I ordered. And again, you give up a lot of horsepower on the lower trim Santa Cruz trucklets. So not for those who thirst after horsepower.
Bottom line. If you're wavering like me, I'd say go test drive a Santa Cruz in one of the lower trims (SE or SEL). You might find yourself pleasantly surprised. I'd love to hear the impressions of others who actually physically compared the two cars (sorry, trucks).
I really don't get that comment, like at all. The only thing the OP left out of their initial post was a link to the SC Forums. Seriously he should just go buy one of those.For the record the build of my Maverick is solid and rugged! Doesn’t feel cheap at all!
No, the Santa Cruz is a brand new chassis and engine called their SmartStream series, whereas that article is related to the Theta II. The jury is still out on whether or not it will be reliable, but it is all new.Hard pass. Look at their historical and current recalls related to vehicle fires. There have been serious injuries including deaths. Like this they have to give long warranties or else people wouldn't step into their death traps. I believe the SC is based on one of those recalled vehicles. Amazing the "cheaper" feeling Maverick is safer than the "top quality" Hyundai.
I'm on both forums and can confirm, Hyundai/Kia keep saying they will add it, but year after year they don't. Even the new 2023 Kia Sportage still doesn't have it. That said, you can buy little dongles you plug into the USB port that add wireless capability.From what I have seen on their forums, the two top trims (Limited and Premium) dont come with wireless carplay. Only the two lower trims have it. (SE and SEL)
Very strange that highest trims do not have wireless CarPlay. The lack of color options is also odd . No red only the Tucson has had which has same grill as cruz .No, the Santa Cruz is a brand new chassis and engine called their SmartStream series, whereas that article is related to the Theta II. The jury is still out on whether or not it will be reliable, but it is all new.
I'm on both forums and can confirm, Hyundai/Kia keep saying they will add it, but year after year they don't. Even the new 2023 Kia Sportage still doesn't have it. That said, you can buy little dongles you plug into the USB port that add wireless capability.
I have a GT500 / 67 engine #s don't match lolI know of a GT500 / 67 engine #s don't match. Wonder how much it's worth -)