Haha! Same with my Titan.My 2006 Tundra (1st Gen) DBL Cab 4x4 has a turning radius of two football fields; I welcome the Maverick with open arms!
it’sa good family combination!! SUV and Truck!Thanks for this! My wife is about to get a '22 Outback Limited and I'm planning on a Mav in a year or so.
The Outback also has AWD as I'm sure you know. An AWD Maverick is apparently rated for 22/29/25. But if AWD is not a benefit for you, the FWD hybrid will definitely save you some change at the pump!I love my Subie, but the 23 mpg (+/-) I get is a huge reason why I ordered the Maverick.
As a person who was considering a 5th-gen Ford Explorer to replace a pickup truck, I say it depends on an individual's specific needs.I find a large box more useful overall than a partially always open smaller box.
I sadly have a spreadsheet with specs for a wide variety of cars. Not a sedan person. I move weird shaped things fairly often. (Artist.) When this was announced...a hybrid that has actual utility, I was so excited. Just waiting somewhat patiently.Thank you for this! I've got a 2021 Outback Onyx Edition, and I've been driving myself crazy comparing dimensions between the two. I love my Subie, but the 23 mpg (+/-) I get is a huge reason why I ordered the Maverick.
C&D says thee 22 OutBack is close to 40 inches and the Maverick is 35.9 so it's about 4 inches more. At the huge risk of running smack into an old joke, 4 inches is a lot when you're talking legroom. My C-Max is about 36 inches and going back/forth to our OutBack was quite noticeable back then.5” more? The AWD shown is only 2” more (legroom) - subi is 38.1 while maverick is 36.9”! I thought it would “feel closer” than it was
Absolutely.I say it depends on an individual's specific needs.
Gimme 40 acres and I’ll turn this rig around.My 2006 Tundra (1st Gen) DBL Cab 4x4 has a turning radius of two football fields; I welcome the Maverick with open arms!
ahhh well my wife’s Outback is a 19 so justcomparing with a car I sit in weeklyC&D says thee 22 OutBack is close to 40 inches and the Maverick is 35.9 so it's about 4 inches more. At the huge risk of running smack into an old joke, 4 inches is a lot when you're talking legroom. My C-Max is about 36 inches and going back/forth to our OutBack was quite noticeable back then.
Same here. Our Ranger has a nice, tight (for its size) turning radius yet our Honda Ridgeline has the same turning radius as the Queen Elizabeth II..Seems there are two separate and vary different guides to turning radius- I have been confused on this for awhile as our AWD highlander turns like a train while other AWD units have a better radius somehow- Hoping the Maverick would be better
I googled the specs, and it shows the headroom almost identical? Was the Maverick seat all the way down? or did it have a sunroof?Just got back from the dealer. Bumped my head trying to get in. Damn...
Guess I'll be sticking with my Forester.