Sponsored

houselog442

Well-known member
First Name
James
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
137
Reaction score
163
Location
Tallahassee, FL
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick

vezpa

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
EMG
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Threads
44
Messages
747
Reaction score
1,542
Location
IL/IN border
Vehicle(s)
Too many to list.
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
I wish I would have gotten that optional cruise control on my XL they mention. šŸ¤”
 

WesM

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Wes
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
18
Messages
896
Reaction score
1,613
Location
Maryland USA
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Ha - that will be fun. The Hybrid never meant to be fast the fact that it's not a dog is good enough for me!
Yeah lol, I'm just happy my hybrid wont be a slug. Not like I will be drag racing anyone.

And thats a great time for the 2.0!

I'm hoping their comment about engine buzz on the hybrid can be quieted down with an engine cover.
 

Sponsored

Decayed

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
yes
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
3,126
Reaction score
4,819
Location
Directly above the center of the Earth
Vehicle(s)
a car
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Figures the 4k would be faster off the line what with the higher ratio diff. Very nice to see the hybrid is no slouch either. Something for everybody.
 

Vinhnguyen54

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Vinh
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
73
Reaction score
185
Location
Washington State
Vehicle(s)
2016 F150
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
"The front-drive-only hybrid has a power level better matched to powering only the front wheels. Its 2.5-liter emits more four-cylinder buzz than the quiet 2.0T, but it's not obnoxious."

Too bad they didn't get to do the performance tests for the hybrid. Somebody do drag and roll race between the 2 already! Can't wait!

They also said they got 29mpg on the highway and 21mpg observed. Does anyone know if they are calculating these MPG numbers themselves?

MT got 7.6s
Mr. Boom got 6.56
CD got 5.9s

Quite a spread...interesting anyhow
 

Sjbuck2021

Well-known member
Banned
First Name
Scott
Joined
Nov 17, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
375
Reaction score
280
Location
06066
Vehicle(s)
2017 Frontier /2018 Acura RDX

Sjbuck2021

Well-known member
Banned
First Name
Scott
Joined
Nov 17, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
375
Reaction score
280
Location
06066
Vehicle(s)
2017 Frontier /2018 Acura RDX
Ha - that will be fun. The Hybrid never meant to be fast the fact that it's not a dog is good enough for me!
In this day and age I'd rather have 40 mpg than fast 0-60 time's. If I wanted fast 0-60 time's I would have bought the tesla.
 

Delzona

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jul 3, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
4,373
Reaction score
9,203
Location
Tucson, AZ
Vehicle(s)
15 Breakout, 21 Road King Special, 22 Maverick XLT
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
How many XL owners missed out on "optional" cruise control?! šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£
 
Sponsored

WesM

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Wes
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
18
Messages
896
Reaction score
1,613
Location
Maryland USA
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
"The front-drive-only hybrid has a power level better matched to powering only the front wheels. Its 2.5-liter emits more four-cylinder buzz than the quiet 2.0T, but it's not obnoxious."

Too bad they didn't get to do the performance tests for the hybrid. Somebody do drag and roll race between the 2 already! Can't wait!

They also said they got 29mpg on the highway and 21mpg observed. Does anyone know if they are calculating these MPG numbers themselves?

MT got 7.6s
Mr. Boom got 6.56
CD got 5.9s

Quite a spread...interesting anyhow
I think MT got 7s for their 2.0. The hybrid got 7.6s 0-60 in the MT tests.

Also, yes I spend way too much time reading about Maverick stuff šŸ˜³
 

Vinhnguyen54

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Vinh
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
73
Reaction score
185
Location
Washington State
Vehicle(s)
2016 F150
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I think MT got 7s for their 2.0. The hybrid got 7.6s 0-60 in the MT tests.

Also, yes I spend way too much time reading about Maverick stuff šŸ˜³

You are right! Tighter spread now :)

MT got 7s
Mr. Boom got 6.56
CD got 5.9s
 

jtpc2021

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 1, 2021
Threads
31
Messages
647
Reaction score
1,056
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Lol, I canā€™t wait to read these comments between the overly defensive Hybrid and Ecoboost owners.
šŸ˜„

ā€œmy ecoboost will smoke you!ā€

-ā€œmy hybrid is almost as quick and gets 2x city mpg!ā€

ā€œI still hate your stupid hybrid maverick! FX4 rocks!!ā€

-ā€œidiot country person..ā€
 
OP
OP

houselog442

Well-known member
First Name
James
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
137
Reaction score
163
Location
Tallahassee, FL
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick
It is pretty simple. Some people are only now getting a hybrid Maverick, even though they ordered in June. The question really is, ā€œhow badly do you want your Maverick right now?ā€ I know itā€™s not as bad as a Bronco order but still, thatā€™s why i cancelled a hybrid Maverick order and bought an ecoboost off a lot, I just donā€™t know how long it will take to get it. I feel bad for people who ordered a Bronco and still havenā€™t gotten one after a year and a half!
Sponsored

 
 




Top