Sponsored

April & Hoovie compare the Maverick and Santa Cruz

Scott Asheville

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Scott
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Threads
74
Messages
2,043
Reaction score
4,606
Location
Asheville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2022 AWD XLT ECO LUX CP360 HPR
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
A lot of fun to watch. They keep it light. I hope we do too.

They do get one thing wrong, but so do most of the people on MTC. The Maverick bed is not a half foot longer than the SC. It's just a few inches longer. Everyone subtracts the space taken by the hard roller tonneau cover (which is only on the Limited trim). Also I think they got the HP wrong on the 2024 ecoboost. And I believe the length of the two vehicles is like less than an inch - so the SC is not smaller.

Oh, they're comparing a 2024 Mav XLT ECO with a 2025 SC SEL. I like that XLT ECO to SEL comparison best, because they both have conventional automatics. I'd advise don't take the video too seriously. Just enjoy the fun. Oh, and fanboys should close eyes and ears when they compare the engine bays. You don't want to see that part.



PS: Also close ears when they point out that the SC is built in the good old USA by Americans. That's an inconvenient truth that we don't talk about here.
Sponsored

 

Hunters Edge

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Sid
Joined
Jan 26, 2024
Threads
25
Messages
1,457
Reaction score
1,604
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
F150 crew
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
They got a lot wrong on the comparison including leg room, size of bed Maverick 33 cubic ft Santa Cruz 27 cubic ft. I watched one video they couldn't get the tonneau cover to retract it was frozen shut. A lot of reasons not listed and that's why the Santa Cruz is not selling no where near the number of Ford Maverick. Consumers are not that gullible and many research the competition before purchasing. I personally didn't care for the video and thought it was misleading. Thanks for posting though.
 
 







Top