This would be city mileage, no electric when cruising at freeway speed.Wonder how many times he got flipped off on the highway
Sponsored
This would be city mileage, no electric when cruising at freeway speed.Wonder how many times he got flipped off on the highway
I read it was the 2013 model?I have a 2015 Ford C max that had a 42/37/40 combined mpg with 166000 miles on it now and have an average of 41.6 mpg since new. This was the vehicle that Ford had rated at 48 mpg orginally and had to pay buyers almost $ 1000 for bad advertising.
Wait are you saying it's more efficient to use gas to go up a hill, shut off the engine, use regen braking to charge the battery going down hill, and drive in electric only going up the hill with the engine turning on towards the end (not all energy was captured); compared to driving with gas engine at constant RPM on a flat surface?On a route with rolling hills this is easily reproducible.
Interesting thought experiment.Wait are you saying it's more efficient to use gas to go up a hill, shut off the engine, use regen braking to charge the battery going down hill, and drive in electric only going up the hill with the engine turning on towards the end (not all energy was captured); compared to driving with gas engine at constant RPM on a flat surface?
... at 30 mph. I get more like 60 mpg at that speed.drove 50 miles in Nashville and got 50mpg
False, in part. No EV above 85 mph, it's true. Below, there's no difference.This would be city mileage, no electric when cruising at freeway speed.
The original 47/47/47 ratings were changed in summer, 2013 (Ford used Fusion aero load on the taller C-Max) and again a year later (Ford had an error across the platform). My lifetime was 42 mpg. but that included winters.I read it was the 2013 model?
Close. It's called "pulse and glide."Wait are you saying ....
Who?Without the hybrid you'll be lucky to even get 30 on the hwy. I average 35 + in the city alone in my 100% petrol Honda. I do run premium but only to get the range, under a 11 gallon tank I'm cruising over 424 miles.
Sadly the Honda is a dog, but what utility. With the blessings (of you know who) I'm looking towards the Maverick in 2025. Hybrid of course, it would be my last vehicle. I'm building a camper and hitting the road, hope to die somewhere quiet alone and not in a old folks home being abused, humiliated and robbed by low-lives at minimum wage.
You use the EV up the hill and regen down it. I’ve done this over a 15 mile stretch a few times in the misses’ Tucson and yielded 50-55mpg for the entire trip. The Tuscan Is rated @ 38mpg.Wait are you saying it's more efficient to use gas to go up a hill, shut off the engine, use regen braking to charge the battery going down hill, and drive in electric only going up the hill with the engine turning on towards the end (not all energy was captured); compared to driving with gas engine at constant RPM on a flat surface?
Not necessarily disagreeing, it's an interesting situation.
Have you checked the battery level before and after doing this?You use the EV up the hill and regen down it. I’ve done this over a 15 mile stretch a few times in the misses’ Tucson and yielded 50-55mpg for the entire trip.
Your math skills are very suspect.Dang, for a minute my bubble was flying high and the you burst it. This hybrid was doing a slow speed pass around downtown Nashville at an average of about 14mph (100 minutes of driving to cover 50 miles)
That's great, never drive uphill ever again.when i fill up my Niro and then drive 3 miles downhill it shows 190 mpg
*Insert clapping gif*Your math skills are very suspect.
100 minutes at 14 MPH travels 23.3 miles not 50 miles.
1h 41m 57s is 101.95 minutes or 1.7 hours
50.8 miles in 1.7 hours is 29.9 MPH average
The SOC gauge never goes below 1/2 charged during that run.Have you checked the battery level before and after doing this?
I'm wondering if you are drawing down the battery over this 15 mile stretch, then having to recharge it in later driving.