Sponsored

Lone Star Proud

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
William
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Threads
17
Messages
593
Reaction score
1,470
Location
Central Texas
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick XLT
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
as we will hopefully see soon, individual results WILL vary. If you look on the multiple treads for the EB fuel economy, you will see a 5+ MPG difference in everyone's posts. I assume this difference will be exacerbated with the hybrid. Coming from driving a Prius I know first hand that fuel economy is in the foot of the driver and the best way to get the highest numbers is to drive to conserve. unfortunately driving in this manner is difficult and frankly BORING! I am willing to bet most drivers will get closer to the 33MPG highway then they will to 39.
I'll still take that. My current car gets 27 and uses super premium unleaded. I'm ready to move on.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

ColoradoShooter

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
353
Reaction score
716
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
Tacoma/Fusion
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
This article explained nothing new about the “Hybrid” suspension that we didn’t already know. It’s a FWD setup, not AWD which is where the differences are. I bought an AWD EB for the mpg savings I’ll be getting over my current vehicle and I wanted more torque and capability than the Hybrid could give me. I’m not upset in the least.
 

brnpttmn

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
1,938
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I would say the vast majority of people do not do 100% highway driving. Comparing the combined ratings might be more useful, so what is it - 26 for the EB and 37 for the Hybrid? That is quite significant. With the hybrid being significantly more efficient and insignificantly slower, it is a win/win.
It's technically impossible to do 100% highway driving due to how the EPA runs their litmus tests (their highway measures are taken with a "warmed engine" and at relatively stable high speeds).
 

ghost1986

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
130
Reaction score
294
Location
Danville PA
Vehicle(s)
2005 Grand Marquis
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Now THIS is the content Ive been waiting for. I adore how simple that looks versus the mess of the AWD underside. I climbed under one at my dealer and immediately said f*** that. I wouldnt put up with that absurdity, i dont trust any of it.

Front drive ecoboost XL for me.
 

Bootstrap6

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Will
Joined
Oct 27, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
67
Reaction score
73
Location
Maryland
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mazda 3 Hothatch Grand Touring
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
39 at 80% highway? So Ill be perfectly fine on 495. Well mileage-wise. The crazy reckless drivers is a whole other ball game.
 

Sponsored

dalola

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
1,852
Reaction score
2,628
Location
Ohio
Website
sunsetridgecabinhockinghills.com
Vehicle(s)
F150
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Really gonna upset the EB crowd who rushed out to buy the first Maverick on the lot with this info. A few people here seem to justify their purchase like this instead of the multiple other advantages the EB has over the hybrid.

IMO it was always a poor argument - you’re already paying more for the EcoBoost AND you’re getting less MPG even if it’s “only” 3 less on the highway. You’re starting off in the hole and literally cannot close the gap.

Just doesn’t make sense.

Regardless, this is great news for the hybrid!
I don't think anyone would choose the EB option thinking it will get better FE than the hybrid. Usually, it comes down to the want/need for AWD, and/or the 4K tow ability. If there was an AWD 4K hybrid Mav, heck yes, sign me up.


I thought that this wasn't a "hybrid" suspension.. But a fwd vs awd suspension..... Because how you are making it sound, hybrid has its own suspension, eco fwd has its own and awd has its own.. Like said I believe its only fwd and awd
Exactly right, it's FWD vs AWD, the rear sus design has nothing to do with the fact it's a hybrid. Ford has used this design on lot's of small FWD platforms, starting back in the Focus days.
 

ryryOP

2.5L Hybrid
Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Oct 7, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
6
Reaction score
5
Location
Utah
Vehicle(s)
Ford Maverick XLT Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
This is so helpful! I'm super stoked that the Hybrid has a ton more wheel liner than the EB from the factory. Still lots of little bolts and mounting points I'll want to spray with rust proofer though.
 

mamboman777

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Josh
Joined
Aug 3, 2021
Threads
111
Messages
3,465
Reaction score
11,750
Location
NRH, TX
Vehicle(s)
2012 Ford Focus, 2022 Ford Maverick
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
. What you can’t see here, though, is how nicely tuned it all is. It may indeed be simple, but it just works.

1638372305314.gif
This sounds nice
 

rosepedal99

Active member
First Name
Charles
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
30
Reaction score
37
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle(s)
Maverick
All Greek to me, lots of cool pictures, highlight to me was less than 8 gallons on 311 miles, that’s already going to save me about $100 a month
 

maverick4natic

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
Joined
Oct 25, 2021
Threads
18
Messages
206
Reaction score
408
Location
Minnesota
Vehicle(s)
Chevy HHR
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
Here is good article from Autoblog. It was a very good read about Maverick Hybrid Suspension. I hope you enjoy reading it.

Here the link: https://www.autoblog.com/2021/12/01/ford-maverick-fuel-economy-suspension-deep-dive/

2022 Ford Maverick Hybrid MPG and Suspension Deep Dive | 39 mpg and 1 twist beam
Hybrid doesn't just get vastly better fuel economy, it has a different rear suspension, too

0_lede.jpg3.jpg


I don’t think I’ve ever been approached more enthusiastically at a gas pump. No less than three passersby wandered up while I was manning the nozzle stuck into the side of this 2022 Ford Maverick, their wide-eyed questions including, “Is that the new hybrid?” “What kind of mileage do you get?” “Is it all-wheel drive?”

“It is the new hybrid,” I said, but sheepishly had to admit I didn’t yet know the MPG because I was giving the tank a quick top-up so I could reset the trip odometer and record how it’d do over the coming week. I’d have said, “Impressive as hell,” if they had wandered up after I’d completed 311.1 miles of driving. The 7.91 gallons I added at the finish worked out to 39.3 mpg, a figure that destroys the truck’s EPA combined rating of 37 mpg.

It gets better. City driving is where hybrids really shine, and indeed the Maverick’s rating breaks down to 42 mpg city and 33 mpg highway. Any EPA combined rating is a weighted average that assumes 55% of the mileage will be city driving and 45% will be highway, so it’s doubly amazing that I recorded a 39.3 mpg average with a driving mix that included fully 80% highway driving at 70 mph.

What does this have to do with a suspension deep dive? More than you might think. To answer that passerby's all-wheel-drive question, no this Maverick hybrid doesn't have it. In fact, every hybrid is front-wheel drive and that's not all. Ford didn't merely omit the rear drive axles and a differential for the hybrid, it has a completely different rear suspension layout than the all-wheel drive models that come exclusively with the 2.0-liter turbo-four (and vice versa).



1_Loaded.jpg


My Cyber Orange machine was loaded for perhaps four or five of those miles. I helped a friend tear down a trade show booth and haul about 400 to 450 pounds of stuff back to his shop, where he let me shoot these photos. The truck shouldered this load admirably, with nary a hint of sag. I was impressed with the smooth and quiet way it sucked up Michigan-level frost heaves when it was empty, too. Considering the price point and fuel efficiency of this machine, they’ve tuned this suspension quite well.



2_fr_strut_oa_arrow.jpg


There’s nothing groundbreaking going on up front. It’s a common strut setup that looks very similar to what underpins the Ford Bronco Sport we looked at a few months ago. As with the Bronco Sport, the bulk of the transverse-mounted hybrid powertrain (green arrow) is positioned slightly ahead of the front axle.



3_fr_low_oa_arrow.jpg


This joint (green) is one of several places where the suspension subframe bolts to the unibody. The aluminum lower wishbone needs no arrow because it stands out against the background, but the compact nature of the steel steering knuckle (red) is easy to miss because it blends into the background.



4_fr_larm_under_arrow.jpg


The lower control arm employs a reverse L-shape design, so named because while lateral cornering loads (green) feed in directly to the chassis through its stiff forward bushing, the longitudinal component of harsh ride inputs get turned through 90 degrees and push in at the more voluminous rear (red) bushing. You might hear engineers refer to the “ride bushing” in a given suspension, and in a reverse L-arm strut layout like this, it’s the one in the back.



5_fr_low_rr_oa_arrow.jpg


Nearly every transverse front drive setup I know of places the bulk of the engine and transmission assembly ahead of the front axle, and that means the steering rack (green) can only fit behind it and operate behind the steering axis in what is called a “rear steer” orientation.



6_fr_stab_link_arrow.jpg


The stabilizer bar (green) spans the Maverick behind the engine, as well, which is why we see its connecting link bolted to a tab welding on the rear of the strut housing. This kind of strut mounting is called a direct mount, in that the stabilizer bar link moves up and down in lock-step with the wheel amounting to a 1-to-1 motion ratio.

7_fr_brk_arrow.jpg


The main driver of hybrid fuel efficiency, especially in the city, comes down to magnetic “regenerative braking” via the electric motor/generator that’s buried in the hybrid transmission housing. The ability to recover braking energy in this way and transform it into electricity for the battery is essentially what makes a hybrid work. This action is still triggered by the brake pedal, but a computer decides whether magnetic regenerative braking or traditional friction braking will be sufficient for your brake input, then acts accordingly.

As such, this single-piston caliper and ventilated rotor are sized as if they’re the sole braking system, but they won’t see regular use unless you’re in the habit of stopping short and hammering the brakes. The best way to up your MPG in a hybrid is to look ahead, anticipate slowdowns and brake gradually so you recover as much of the braking energy as possible. In fact, the Maverick hybrid’s dash has a meter that pops up to give you instant feedback to help you learn where that threshold lies. Pay close attention and you won’t just up your MPG, you might just get 100,000 miles out of these brake pads, too.



8_rr_oa.jpg.jpg


This overall view doesn’t reveal much about the Maverick hybrid’s rear suspension beyond the point that it's quite simple.



9_rr_looking_down_arrow.jpg


Now we can identify this as a twist-beam rear suspension, a simple and inexpensive semi-independent suspension type built around a vehicle-spanning beam (red) that stretches under the vehicle to the other side. Why semi-independent? The left and right wheels are both firmly attached to the ends of the same large u-shaped steel structure, but that structure is wide enough that it twists in the middle and allows some independent movement.

The twist-beam structure bolts to the chassis and pivots around a single point (green) on each side, and the only thing keeping the spring from falling out at full droop is the internal end-stop built into the rear shock absorber (white.)

Here’s a better look at the scale of the beam (green) that spans across the truck. Imagine a motorcycle swingarm that’s over 4 feet wide with wheels on the outside of each leg instead of one captured in the middle. Or think of it as a giant stabilizer bar with wheels on the ends – which is basically how it functions.


11_rr_stab_bar_insert_arrow.jpg


The twisting stiffness of the twist beam itself is tuned and optimized during development by the fitment of a supplemental stabilizer bar (green) that’s tucked within the beam’s open cross-section.



12_rr_motion-ratio_arrow.jpg


That supplemental stabilizer bar (green) is welded in place, and since the wheels are bolted to flanges welded to the beam ends, the roll-stiffness motion ratio can only be 1-to-1. The twist beam is, after all, one big piece.

As for the spring’s motion ratio, the spring pocket looks to be slightly ahead of the axis of the wheel itself, so we’ll call it 0.9-to-1. Meanwhile, the shock is bolted behind the wheel bearing and hub, so it will actually move more than the wheel over a given bump in what looks to be a 1.2-to-1 motion ratio.



13_rr_side_low_arrow.jpg


The problem with twist beam suspensions is they can produce rear toe-out as the outside rear suspension compresses and gets exposed to lateral loads – a bad thing for the outside rear tire to do in a sweeping bend. The situation is complex because you’d want a stiff bushing to minimize toe changes in such conditions but a soft one to soak up ride harshness. One of the ways to combat this is to skew the pivot bushing pocket (green) outwards toward the front.



14_rr_bushing_close_arrow.jpg


Here the inner face of the bushing (green) rests against the outwardly canted bushing pocket, which creates a ramp that gives the mounting point lateral and forward support when subjected to cornering forces. But the opposite side (red) is more open, so that the bushing can pulse back and absorb the harsh rearward component of road impacts. It’s not perfect, but it helps.

Still, this one conflicting trait defines the limitations of twist beam suspensions, which is why you won’t see it on anything much larger and heavier than a Maverick. But they are light, inexpensive, space-efficient and easy to install on the assembly line, which is why it’s been employed here on the low-cost, front-wheel-drive Maverick hybrid.



15_rr_oa_rr_even_arrow.jpg


This view gives you an inside look at all of the various brackets that are welded to the twist beam, and we can see the flange (green) to which the caliper and wheel bearing are bolted.



16_rr_top_arrow.jpg


The upper end of the shock absorber is bolted to the unibody bed structure from within the wheel well, which is why the inner surface of the bed needs no access panels. The rear suspension bump stop resides within the black plastic boot we see here.



17_rr_brk_arrow.jpg


The Maverick hybrid is light enough that a solid brake rotor does the job, and its single-piston sliding caliper has an electric parking brake actuator (green) hanging off the back. Meanwhile, that big hunk of metal (red) has no suspension function whatsoever. It’s a towing tie-down point.



18_Tire-with-weight.jpg


The Ford Maverick Hybrid XLT rolls on 225/65R17 Continental ProContact TX tires mounted to 17-by-7 inch aluminum alloy wheels, and the combination weighs in at a tidy 49 pounds.

As for the all-wheel-drive Maverick, which isn’t a hybrid, its rear suspension should be very similar to the multilink we saw underneath the Bronco Sport, at least in concept. As for the Maverick hybrid suspension we just saw, its simplicity is no surprise at all considering its ultra-low base price. What you can’t see here, though, is how nicely tuned it all is. It may indeed be simple, but it just works.

1638372305314.gif
Nice article very cool to see how it all works.

@doug2104 How did you translate the article to the forum, Code?
 
Sponsored

Old Fart

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Sep 30, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
324
Reaction score
395
Location
Mid Florida
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick XLT; 2016 Prius ECO
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Clubs
 
My Prius V consistantly beats the EPA rated mileage (40 Hwy, 44 city), my overall has been 44+ mpg, highway is more like 46, city driving I try to pick slower roads as the electric only kicks out at 41 mph. Wifey's Prius ECO averages 63mpg and her highway is 66mpg. We tend to drive at speed limit, to piss off OPEC, want to save gas, slow down.
 
OP
OP
doug2104

doug2104

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
JD
Joined
Jul 14, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
135
Reaction score
226
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
2022 Maverick Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Nice article very cool to see how it all works.

@doug2104 How did you translate the article to the forum, Code?
I cannot take any credit for the article showing here on this post. I think the administrator did it. All that was post by me was the text and the link done by me.
 
Last edited:

Decayed

2.0L EcoBoost
Well-known member
First Name
yes
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
3,151
Reaction score
4,857
Location
Directly above the center of the Earth
Vehicle(s)
a car
Engine
2.0L EcoBoost
Really gonna upset the EB crowd who rushed out to buy the first Maverick on the lot with this info. A few people here seem to justify their purchase like this instead of the multiple other advantages the EB has over the hybrid.

IMO it was always a poor argument - you’re already paying more for the EcoBoost AND you’re getting less MPG even if it’s “only” 3 less on the highway. You’re starting off in the hole and literally cannot close the gap.

Just doesn’t make sense.

Regardless, this is great news for the hybrid!
Doesn't upset me at all. Maximum efficiency was never my main priority. I need a vehicle with AWD for severe weather and the towing capacity for a small trailer. They hybrid simply can't do what I need it to do.

The point was always that the eco is still a fairly efficient vehicle compared to most of the non hybrid market and is certainly the most efficient pickup on the market this year. Going straight by the EPA numbers they aren't that far apart and of course that's all we had to go on. But the hybrid is optimized for mainly for efficiency whereas the eco is set up for power and efficiency.

Very glad for Ford and all the people focused on efficiency that the hybrid is so efficient. This is great news.
 

ZachSD

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Oct 17, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
125
Reaction score
330
Location
San Diego
Vehicle(s)
2004 GMC Canyon 3.5L (159k)
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
Will be saving me $214.49/month in gas at current valuations 🤑
 

Shay

2.5L Hybrid
Well-known member
First Name
Sam
Joined
Jul 3, 2021
Threads
46
Messages
832
Reaction score
3,495
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Website
www.youtube.com
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Maverick XL Hybrid
Engine
2.5L Hybrid
I thought that this wasn't a "hybrid" suspension.. But a fwd vs awd suspension..... Because how you are making it sound, hybrid has its own suspension, eco fwd has its own and awd has its own.. Like said I believe its only fwd and awd
Correct. The twist-beam rear suspension is on both the Hybrid and EcoBoost FWD.
Sponsored

 
 




Top