Retail on it $419, so I'm hoping once i get brackets and what not designed and available to purchase, folks use me/my product to make up the time/cost involved lol
As mentioned in the video, that's an ongoing work in progress, realistically with the stock engine/turbo, a 2.0 60' is likely to be the best the truck will see. we've already shaved aroubd 0.15 off the 60' , 2.3 seconds off the best 0-60, and 2 seconds off best 1/4 mile. i'm trying to find a set...
For now I'm in a holding pattern until more companies release products, and then I'll purchase parts from the companies, test them, see what does and doesnt work, and go from there. I don't plan on trying to make this a race truck or anything crazy tbh, I just wanna help Sam offer the best...
The headlights are virtually identical to the Explorer headlights as the led reflectors are very similar (we have a 2021 explorer st that i just took the lights apart on.) that said.. a headlight isnt designed for fog. and Optics for Fog lights and where the light is designed to project is...
Not necessarily robbery unless folks pay out of pocket for them. aftermarket options, if ever offered will probably be half the cost but look very similar.
I don't think so honestly. That said, as soon as a couple more companies release parts, I will purchase them all and we will do comparison tests to see who/what works and doesnt work.
With enough money. Absolutely. For me to make them it isnt cost effective for most folks. I've reached out to a couple suppliers overseas to see if they have any interest on doing kvskd like the f150s
I know this is a hot topic for lots of folks and it's taken me a while to get to it, but I have 3 different foglights headed my way, an fx4 bumer with the tow hooks that'll be here hopefully this week, and brackets ready to test.
Hoping all goes accordingly and I can make something clean and...
We ran into a couple torque management issues, but hoping to have those sorted this evening and then plan to make some 0-60 and 1/4 mile hits once done!
Lol... 87 is all the maverick needs.
You shouldn't need an owners manual to tell you that more octane = better performance. Common sense should tell you that.
There's a reason 87 takes up 1/3rd of the page.
I'd have to pull one back off and weigh again. But I know they are 11lbs heavier than the stocks, per corner. So 44lbs total. Which ricer math equates to roughly 160+ of unsprung weight
Intake will be negligible as far as gains. Same with downpipe. Between the two, another 10 MAYBE 15 whp and lb/ft of torque.
Intercooler is definitely a 100% must. Turbos will be tricky due to the electric wastegate, what I'm thinking I/we'll end up doing is welding one onto a larger turbo